[PATCH] D69853: [OpenMP][NFCI] Introduce llvm/IR/OpenMPConstants.h

[Johannes Doerfert via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

jdoerfert marked 5 inline comments as done.
jdoerfert added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:4011
   unsigned NamedModifiersNumber = 0;
-  SmallVector<const OMPIfClause *, OMPC_unknown + 1> FoundNameModifiers(
-      OMPD_unknown + 1);
+  SmallVector<const OMPIfClause *, unsigned(OMPC_unknown) + 1>
+  FoundNameModifiers(unsigned(OMPD_unknown) + 1);
----------------
Meinersbur wrote:
> ABataev wrote:
> > jdoerfert wrote:
> > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > jdoerfert wrote:
> > > > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > > > JonChesterfield wrote:
> > > > > > > I wonder if it would be worth wrapping the accesses to FoundNameModifiers in functor that does the enum class to unsigned conversion. E.g. a class instance that contains the small vector and exposes operator[] that takes the enum class.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > FoundNameModifiers[unsigned(val)] is quite a lot of line noise.
> > > > > > Why `map`? It can be represented as a simple c-style array without any problems.
> > > > > No, these are not enums that auto-convert to unsigned.
> > > > Convert them manually. Replacing the simple hash array with map does not look like a good solution.
> > > I feel this this is a micro optimization that will make the code less maintainable and, as Jon noted, "FoundNameModifiers[unsigned(val)] is quite a lot of line noise.". 
> > > Take a look at the first version and let me know if you want to go back to that one for this part, if so, I can do that.
> > You already introduced special wrapper class in the same file, maybe you can reuse for implicit conversions?
> We are introducing an `EnumeratedArray` class in https://reviews.llvm.org/D68827#change-XphX8PAWFr8V . It should reduce the need for casting and `OpenMPDirectiveKindExWrapper`.
Arguably, the easiest and cleanest way is to use a `map` to *map directives to if clauses*.

The wrapper is in a different file but I can write another one for here.

EnumeratedArray could probably be used here, it is not in yet though.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853