[PATCH] D69382: [clangd] Do not insert parentheses when completing a using declaration

Kadir Cetinkaya via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 25 06:41:07 PDT 2019


kadircet added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/CodeComplete.cpp:483
   bool EnableFunctionArgSnippets;
+  bool CompleteArgumentList;
 };
----------------
maybe rather use `GenerateSnippets`? Since this doesn't generate completions for the snippets, but rather disables generation of any snippets at all.

also I think it makes sense to document this one, because of the field just above it.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/CodeComplete.cpp:1466
       Output.Completions.back().Score = C.second;
       Output.Completions.back().CompletionTokenRange = ReplacedRange;
     }
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> kadircet wrote:
> > why not handle `SnippetSuffix` in here ?
> > 
> > instead of propagating `IsUsingDeclaration`, we can just drop `Output.Completions.back().SnippetSuffix` in here, which sounds like a more appropriate layering.
> > considering we don't really have context specific knowledge in `CodeCompletionBuilder` ?
> I was trying to keep all processing of snippets in one place. 
> Code completion code is hard enough to navigate as it stands today...
> 
> Although I agree doing this when summarizing items in a bundles looks like the wrong layer, but this place is also after bundling, so I'm not sure if it's actually winning us much.
> 
ah ok, that's also a good concern. feel free to choose one or the other then.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69382/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69382





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list