[PATCH] D69241: [clangd] Handle the missing constructor initializers in findExplicitReferences.
Ilya Biryukov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 22 06:21:25 PDT 2019
ilya-biryukov added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/FindTarget.cpp:677
if (const CXXCtorInitializer *CCI = N.get<CXXCtorInitializer>()) {
- if (CCI->isBaseInitializer())
- return refInTypeLoc(CCI->getBaseClassLoc());
- assert(CCI->isAnyMemberInitializer());
- return {ReferenceLoc{NestedNameSpecifierLoc(),
- CCI->getMemberLocation(),
- /*IsDecl=*/false,
- {CCI->getAnyMember()}}};
+ // Other type initializers (e.g. base initializer) are handled by visiting
+ // the typeLoc.
----------------
hokein wrote:
> ilya-biryukov wrote:
> > I believe base initializers are the only ones left, but the comment suggests there are more cases. Maybe change to:
> > ```
> > // Base initializers are handled by visting the type loc.
> > ```
> > Or am I missing something?
> >
> there are others, delegating initializers.
Ah, interesting... Could we add them to the tests too?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69241/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69241
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list