[PATCH] D67613: [DWARF-5] Support for DWARF-5 C++ language tags
Adrian Prantl via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 17 10:02:28 PDT 2019
aprantl added inline comments.
================
Comment at: include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h:2931
+ lang_cxx_11 = /* DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11 */ 0x001a,
+ lang_cxx_14 = /* DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 */ 0x0021
};
----------------
SouraVX wrote:
> aprantl wrote:
> > SouraVX wrote:
> > > aprantl wrote:
> > > > I understand that DWARF does not define a C++17 language constant, but in the AST I fell like we should represent it, even if it is being lowered into C++14 for the debug info.
> > > It's represented in AST as enum in LangStandard.h file. We didn't add it here, as DWARF5 has no opcode for C++17. If we add it here some opcode, this might cause conflict with future upcoming DWARF standard.
> > Since these are the DWARF DW_lang constants, we shouldn't repeat their numeric values here. Can we write this as
> > `lang_c = llvm::dwarf::DW_LANG_C`, etc?
> We can do this, but not sure whether, we should do this in AST ?
> Since it's a language specific part, if we integrate this from DWARF opcodes it will unnecessary pollute AST ? Other language opcodes will also be visible here.
I'm not sure I understand the concern here. Are you worried about #Including "llvm/BinaryFormat/DWARF.h" and making these definitions visible to users of DeclCXX.h? All symbols there are in a separate namespace.
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67613/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67613
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list