[PATCH] D67585: [clang] [cmake] Make building dylib optional

Sat Sep 14 11:49:51 PDT 2019

beanz added a comment.

In D67585#1670491 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67585#1670491>, @mgorny wrote:

> But in that case, we should aim for consistency, i.e. remove the matching option from LLVM.

Yes! I want to do that too.

After the mono-repo transition is finalized I think we need to invest time in cleaning up the LLVM build system and removing a bunch of legacy functionality. At the same time I think we should move the system in a new architectural direction. This is why I'm targeting to have the discussions at the Developer Meeting in October, which corresponds with the mono-repo becoming the source of truth.

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67585/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67585