[PATCH] D65433: [clangd] DefineInline action availability checks

[Alex Lorenz via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

arphaman added a comment.

When fully implemented, will define inline tweak work with C++ methods in classes as well?
E.g.

  HEADER:
  class Foo { void foo(); }
  CPP:
  #include "Header.h"
  void Foo::foo() {}

becomes:

  HEADER:
  class Foo { void foo() { } }
  CPP:
  #include "Header.h"





================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/tweaks/DefineInline.cpp:192
+  Intent intent() const override { return Intent::Refactor; }
+  std::string title() const override { return "Inline function definition"; }
+
----------------
Sorry, I'm not really familiar with design of tweaks, so this might be a bad question: Is it possible to change the title of the tweak on a per-TU basis. More specifically, some tweaks might want to have different titles for Objective-C actions compared to their C++ siblings.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D65433/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D65433