[PATCH] D67140: [analyzer][NFC] Fix inconsistent references to checkers as "checks"
Aaron Ballman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 6 05:00:38 PDT 2019
aaron.ballman added a comment.
In D67140#1659978 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140#1659978>, @Szelethus wrote:
> In D67140#1659907 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140#1659907>, @NoQ wrote:
>
> > In D67140#1659872 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140#1659872>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> >
> > > If we're okay with the inconsistency but still feel like giving ourselves more work, adding proper punctuation to Static Analyzer diagnostics would at least make them grammatically correct. :-D
> >
> >
> > I'd love us some punctuation! Unfortunately the last time a person who actually speaks English committed actively to the Static Analyzer was, like, a couple of years ago at least (:
>
>
> I guess there's a joke waiting to be made about a couple Hungarians and Russians discussing how to write proper English :^)
LOL!
> With that said, we could ask @whisperity to chip in more, he has an ever-growing academic background, and a keen eye for grammatical errors.
I am also happy to help out with this task, though it would have to be on my own time as a best-faith effort.
In D67140#1659982 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140#1659982>, @gribozavr wrote:
> We should take a page from desktop software here. If the messages were in a separate file, there would be a lot of people capable of mass-editing them. When messages are hardcoded in the tool code, navigating and editing them requires more skill, and definitely a lot more jumping around.
Agreed -- this is why Clang puts its diagnostics into .td files (it's not perfect because people still sometimes use positional args when %select{} would be easier to localize, but it's a great start). I think the difficulty the static analyzer and clang-tidy would have doing this is in figuring out how to organize the diagnostics without breaking checker layering.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67140
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list