[PATCH] D64375: [OpenMP][Docs] Provide implementation status details
Jonas Hahnfeld via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 1 23:55:02 PDT 2019
Hahnfeld added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:233
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | mapping lambda expression | claimed | D51107 |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+--------------------------------------------+
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> kkwli0 wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > Done
> > Do we support the behavior in 318:7-14?
> Yes.
ping @jdoerfert
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:250
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| misc extension | library shutdown (omp_pause_resource[_all]) | :part:`worked on` | |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
----------------
Hahnfeld wrote:
> I think this should say partial, it's present in `libomp` after D55078.
ping, I still think `partial` is more correct
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:222-226
+| device extension | clause: reverse_offload | :good:`done` | D52780 |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | clause: atomic_default_mem_order | :good:`done` | D53513 |
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | clause: dynamic_allocators | :good:`done` | D53079 |
----------------
Do we have CodeGen for this? I only remember Sema support...
Also, `reverse_offload` is listed again below as `unclaimed`.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list