[PATCH] D65286: [OpenCL] Allow OpenCL C style vector initialization in C++
John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 31 21:13:49 PDT 2019
rjmccall added a comment.
In D65286#1606441 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65286#1606441>, @Anastasia wrote:
> In D65286#1606071 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D65286#1606071>, @mantognini wrote:
>
> > In `vector_literals_nested.cl`, we have tests for (global) constants. Do you think it would be worth testing those as well in C++ mode? Maybe the two files (`vector_literals_nested.cl` and `vector_literals_valid.cl`) should also be merged as most of their content seems duplicated.
>
>
> Thanks for pointing out. Indeed there was lots of repetition. I only added one missing test case (line 37 of `vector_literals_valid.cl`) and also removed another similar file `test/SemaOpenCL/vector_literals_const.cl`.
>
> > In C++, we have the comma operator and therefore the AST is significantly different. Running the content of your test file with `-x c++` shows that it is rejected as desired. It could be worth having a negative test to ensure we always reject this in vanilla C++.
>
> Added test case in `test/SemaCXX/vector.cpp`. However I am now confused what syntax we shouldn't accept exactly. @rjmccall do you think there should be an error on line 341?
No, it's correct that this is accepted as a vector splat. The warning is good, although it would be even better if we could find a way to warn about this more specifically, like "warning: this syntax does not construct a vector; initial elements are ignored" (needs workshopping, obviously).
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65286/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65286
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list