[PATCH] D59474: [OpenMP 5.0] Codegen support for user-defined mappers
Alexey Bataev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 29 13:25:17 PDT 2019
ABataev added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/OpenMP/declare_mapper_codegen.cpp:44-48
+// CK0-DAG: store i8* %0, i8** [[HANDLEADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i8* %1, i8** [[BPTRADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i8* %2, i8** [[VPTRADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i64 %3, i{{64|32}}* [[SIZEADDR:%[^,]+]]
+// CK0-DAG: store i64 %4, i64* [[TYPEADDR:%[^,]+]]
----------------
lildmh wrote:
> ABataev wrote:
> > lildmh wrote:
> > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > I would not rely on the predetermined indices here, better to use some kind of patterns here just like in other places.
> > > Could you give an example about what you suggest? For instance, some other tests I should look into.
> > Just like in this test when you're using vars.
> Sorry I was not clear before. What do you mean by "predetermined indices" here? If you are referring to, for example, `%0` in `store i8* %0, i8** [[HANDLEADDR:%[^,]+]]`, I guess there is no way to get rid of `%0` because it means the first argument of the function?
Yes, I meant those `%0` like registers. Better to mark them as variables in function declaration and use those names in the checks.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59474/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59474
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list