r366076 - fix unnamed fiefield issue and add tests for __builtin_preserve_access_index intrinsic
Yonghong Song via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 15 17:12:21 PDT 2019
HI, Eric,
No problem!
I just tried the following cmake (removing -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON which is used in my previous build)
cmake -G "Unix Makefiles" -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="BPF;X86" \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/llvm8/bin/clang \
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/llvm8/bin/clang++ \
-DLLVM_TEMPORARILY_ALLOW_OLD_TOOLCHAIN=ON
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$PWD/install ..
and cannot reproduce the issue. If you could send me the cmake
command line which caused failure in your environment. That will
be great!
Thanks,
Yonghong
On 7/15/19, 4:50 PM, "Eric Christopher" <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
Just wanted to let you know I've temporarily reverted this here:
echristo at jhereg ~/s/llvm-project> git llvm push
Pushing 1 commit:
ba7decf8c91 Temporarily Revert "fix unnamed fiefield issue and add
tests for __builtin_preserve_access_index intrinsic"
Sending cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
Sending cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
Deleting cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/builtin-preserve-access-index.c
Deleting cfe/trunk/test/Sema/builtin-preserve-access-index.c
Transmitting file data ..done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 366155.
Committed ba7decf8c91 to svn.
Since the testcase was causing problems in non-assert builds. Feel
free to recommit when you fix that :)
Thanks!
-eric
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 8:42 AM Yonghong Song via cfe-commits
<cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Author: yhs
> Date: Mon Jul 15 08:42:41 2019
> New Revision: 366076
>
> URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject-3Frev-3D366076-26view-3Drev&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=dtjPkUWyM2j7LOCdes9xK0tSCe4BrvYtJpmJu_el7xE&s=LyV9cu6egVjs0MILQtMXrDRw1r2afyEdzsh_tKDRsQE&e=
> Log:
> fix unnamed fiefield issue and add tests for __builtin_preserve_access_index intrinsic
>
> This is a followup patch for https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D61809&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=dtjPkUWyM2j7LOCdes9xK0tSCe4BrvYtJpmJu_el7xE&s=zdwdBj89w175wBRDiJ8ts1YTR7VrNyt4IHp-29y6b8E&e= .
> Handle unnamed bitfield properly and add more test cases.
>
> Fixed the unnamed bitfield issue. The unnamed bitfield is ignored
> by debug info, so we need to ignore such a struct/union member
> when we try to get the member index in the debug info.
>
> D61809 contains two test cases but not enough as it does
> not checking generated IRs in the fine grain level, and also
> it does not have semantics checking tests.
> This patch added unit tests for both code gen and semantics checking for
> the new intrinsic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs at fb.com>
>
> Added:
> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/builtin-preserve-access-index.c
> cfe/trunk/test/Sema/builtin-preserve-access-index.c
> Modified:
> cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
> cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
> URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_cfe_trunk_lib_CodeGen_CGExpr.cpp-3Frev-3D366076-26r1-3D366075-26r2-3D366076-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=dtjPkUWyM2j7LOCdes9xK0tSCe4BrvYtJpmJu_el7xE&s=wNn-0ZBP1UL0gaIGHoTeMMTdnpNcjwneAK5I8Y8AaJY&e=
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp Mon Jul 15 08:42:41 2019
> @@ -3892,6 +3892,23 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitLValueForLam
> return EmitLValueForField(LambdaLV, Field);
> }
>
> +/// Get the field index in the debug info. The debug info structure/union
> +/// will ignore the unnamed bitfields.
> +unsigned CodeGenFunction::getDebugInfoFIndex(const RecordDecl *Rec,
> + unsigned FieldIndex) {
> + unsigned I = 0, Skipped = 0;
> +
> + for (auto F : Rec->getDefinition()->fields()) {
> + if (I == FieldIndex)
> + break;
> + if (F->isUnnamedBitfield())
> + Skipped++;
> + I++;
> + }
> +
> + return FieldIndex - Skipped;
> +}
> +
> /// Get the address of a zero-sized field within a record. The resulting
> /// address doesn't necessarily have the right type.
> static Address emitAddrOfZeroSizeField(CodeGenFunction &CGF, Address Base,
> @@ -3931,7 +3948,7 @@ static Address emitPreserveStructAccess(
> CGF.CGM.getTypes().getCGRecordLayout(rec).getLLVMFieldNo(field);
>
> return CGF.Builder.CreatePreserveStructAccessIndex(
> - base, idx, field->getFieldIndex(), DbgInfo);
> + base, idx, CGF.getDebugInfoFIndex(rec, field->getFieldIndex()), DbgInfo);
> }
>
> static bool hasAnyVptr(const QualType Type, const ASTContext &Context) {
> @@ -4048,7 +4065,7 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitLValueForFie
> getContext().getRecordType(rec), rec->getLocation());
> addr = Address(
> Builder.CreatePreserveUnionAccessIndex(
> - addr.getPointer(), field->getFieldIndex(), DbgInfo),
> + addr.getPointer(), getDebugInfoFIndex(rec, field->getFieldIndex()), DbgInfo),
> addr.getAlignment());
> }
> } else {
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h
> URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_cfe_trunk_lib_CodeGen_CodeGenFunction.h-3Frev-3D366076-26r1-3D366075-26r2-3D366076-26view-3Ddiff&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=dtjPkUWyM2j7LOCdes9xK0tSCe4BrvYtJpmJu_el7xE&s=4q40rgk-KNfA47o6IGYhKniKcB0guzzlsWerlf_-vME&e=
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.h Mon Jul 15 08:42:41 2019
> @@ -2652,6 +2652,9 @@ public:
> /// Converts Location to a DebugLoc, if debug information is enabled.
> llvm::DebugLoc SourceLocToDebugLoc(SourceLocation Location);
>
> + /// Get the record field index as represented in debug info.
> + unsigned getDebugInfoFIndex(const RecordDecl *Rec, unsigned FieldIndex);
> +
>
> //===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
> // Declaration Emission
>
> Added: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/builtin-preserve-access-index.c
> URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_cfe_trunk_test_CodeGen_builtin-2Dpreserve-2Daccess-2Dindex.c-3Frev-3D366076-26view-3Dauto&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=dtjPkUWyM2j7LOCdes9xK0tSCe4BrvYtJpmJu_el7xE&s=vdxrPX0OhC8bZBm-Sdz6KDlEs6zRaTcwF3AltXpLEgs&e=
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/builtin-preserve-access-index.c (added)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/builtin-preserve-access-index.c Mon Jul 15 08:42:41 2019
> @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
> +// RUN: %clang -target x86_64 -emit-llvm -S -g %s -o - | FileCheck %s
> +
> +#define _(x) (__builtin_preserve_access_index(x))
> +
> +const void *unit1(const void *arg) {
> + return _(arg);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit1(i8* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.array.access.index
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.struct.access.index
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.union.access.index
> +
> +const void *unit2(void) {
> + return _((const void *)0xffffffffFFFF0000ULL);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit2()
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.array.access.index
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.struct.access.index
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.union.access.index
> +
> +const void *unit3(const int *arg) {
> + return _(arg + 1);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit3(i32* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.array.access.index
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.struct.access.index
> +// CHECK-NOT: llvm.preserve.union.access.index
> +
> +const void *unit4(const int *arg) {
> + return _(&arg[1]);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit4(i32* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call i32* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0i32.p0i32(i32* %0, i32 0, i32 1)
> +
> +const void *unit5(const int *arg[5]) {
> + return _(&arg[1][2]);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit5(i32** %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call i32** @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0p0i32.p0p0i32(i32** %0, i32 0, i32 1)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call i32* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0i32.p0i32(i32* %2, i32 0, i32 2)
> +
> +struct s1 {
> + char a;
> + int b;
> +};
> +
> +struct s2 {
> + char a1:1;
> + char a2:1;
> + int b;
> +};
> +
> +struct s3 {
> + char a1:1;
> + char a2:1;
> + char :6;
> + int b;
> +};
> +
> +const void *unit6(struct s1 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->a);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit6(%struct.s1* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call i8* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0i8.p0s_struct.s1s(%struct.s1* %0, i32 0, i32 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[STRUCT_S1:[0-9]+]]
> +
> +const void *unit7(struct s1 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->b);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit7(%struct.s1* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call i32* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0i32.p0s_struct.s1s(%struct.s1* %0, i32 1, i32 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[STRUCT_S1]]
> +
> +const void *unit8(struct s2 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->b);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit8(%struct.s2* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call i32* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0i32.p0s_struct.s2s(%struct.s2* %0, i32 1, i32 2), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[STRUCT_S2:[0-9]+]]
> +
> +const void *unit9(struct s3 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->b);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit9(%struct.s3* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call i32* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0i32.p0s_struct.s3s(%struct.s3* %0, i32 1, i32 2), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[STRUCT_S3:[0-9]+]]
> +
> +union u1 {
> + char a;
> + int b;
> +};
> +
> +union u2 {
> + char a;
> + int :32;
> + int b;
> +};
> +
> +const void *unit10(union u1 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->a);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit10(%union.u1* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call %union.u1* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.u1s.p0s_union.u1s(%union.u1* %0, i32 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[UNION_U1:[0-9]+]]
> +
> +const void *unit11(union u1 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->b);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit11(%union.u1* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call %union.u1* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.u1s.p0s_union.u1s(%union.u1* %0, i32 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[UNION_U1]]
> +
> +const void *unit12(union u2 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->b);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit12(%union.u2* %arg)
> +// CHECK-NOT: getelementptr
> +// CHECK: call %union.u2* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.u2s.p0s_union.u2s(%union.u2* %0, i32 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[UNION_U2:[0-9]+]]
> +
> +struct s4 {
> + char d;
> + union u {
> + int b[4];
> + char a;
> + } c;
> +};
> +
> +union u3 {
> + struct s {
> + int b[4];
> + } c;
> + char a;
> +};
> +
> +const void *unit13(struct s4 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->c.b[2]);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit13(%struct.s4* %arg)
> +// CHECK: call %union.u* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0s_union.us.p0s_struct.s4s(%struct.s4* %0, i32 1, i32 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[STRUCT_S4:[0-9]+]]
> +// CHECK: call %union.u* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.us.p0s_union.us(%union.u* %1, i32 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[UNION_I_U:[0-9]+]]
> +// CHECK: call i32* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0i32.p0a4i32([4 x i32]* %b, i32 1, i32 2)
> +
> +const void *unit14(union u3 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg->c.b[2]);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit14(%union.u3* %arg)
> +// CHECK: call %union.u3* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.u3s.p0s_union.u3s(%union.u3* %0, i32 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[UNION_U3:[0-9]+]]
> +// CHECK: call [4 x i32]* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0a4i32.p0s_struct.ss(%struct.s* %c, i32 0, i32 0), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[STRUCT_I_S:[0-9]+]]
> +// CHECK: call i32* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0i32.p0a4i32([4 x i32]* %2, i32 1, i32 2)
> +
> +const void *unit15(struct s4 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg[2].c.a);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit15(%struct.s4* %arg)
> +// CHECK: call %struct.s4* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0s_struct.s4s.p0s_struct.s4s(%struct.s4* %0, i32 0, i32 2)
> +// CHECK: call %union.u* @llvm.preserve.struct.access.index.p0s_union.us.p0s_struct.s4s(%struct.s4* %1, i32 1, i32 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[STRUCT_S4]]
> +// CHECK: call %union.u* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.us.p0s_union.us(%union.u* %2, i32 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[UNION_I_U]]
> +
> +const void *unit16(union u3 *arg) {
> + return _(&arg[2].a);
> +}
> +// CHECK: define dso_local i8* @unit16(%union.u3* %arg)
> +// CHECK: call %union.u3* @llvm.preserve.array.access.index.p0s_union.u3s.p0s_union.u3s(%union.u3* %0, i32 0, i32 2)
> +// CHECK: call %union.u3* @llvm.preserve.union.access.index.p0s_union.u3s.p0s_union.u3s(%union.u3* %1, i32 1), !dbg !{{[0-9]+}}, !llvm.preserve.access.index ![[UNION_U3]]
> +
> +// CHECK: ![[STRUCT_S1]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "s1",
> +// CHECK: ![[STRUCT_S2]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "s2",
> +// CHECK: ![[STRUCT_S3]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "s3",
> +// CHECK: ![[UNION_U1]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_union_type, name: "u1",
> +// CHECK: ![[UNION_U2]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_union_type, name: "u2",
> +// CHECK: ![[STRUCT_S4]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "s4",
> +// CHECK: ![[UNION_I_U]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_union_type, name: "u",
> +// CHECK: ![[UNION_U3]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_union_type, name: "u3",
> +// CHECK: ![[STRUCT_I_S]] = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "s",
>
> Added: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/builtin-preserve-access-index.c
> URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_viewvc_llvm-2Dproject_cfe_trunk_test_Sema_builtin-2Dpreserve-2Daccess-2Dindex.c-3Frev-3D366076-26view-3Dauto&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=dtjPkUWyM2j7LOCdes9xK0tSCe4BrvYtJpmJu_el7xE&s=07_SwhXPP90qkyzer0pZ10w4OJJr_rjS7nj0WpnAcdY&e=
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/builtin-preserve-access-index.c (added)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/builtin-preserve-access-index.c Mon Jul 15 08:42:41 2019
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -dwarf-version=4 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
> +
> +const void *invalid1(const int *arg) {
> + return __builtin_preserve_access_index(&arg[1], 1); // expected-error {{too many arguments to function call, expected 1, have 2}}
> +}
> +
> +void *invalid2(const int *arg) {
> + return __builtin_preserve_access_index(&arg[1]); // expected-warning {{returning 'const void *' from a function with result type 'void *' discards qualifiers}}
> +}
> +
> +const void *invalid3(const int *arg) {
> + return __builtin_preserve_access_index(1); // expected-warning {{incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'const void *'}}
> +}
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_cfe-2Dcommits&d=DwIBaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=DA8e1B5r073vIqRrFz7MRA&m=dtjPkUWyM2j7LOCdes9xK0tSCe4BrvYtJpmJu_el7xE&s=T1DJodYLPvglRosJ1a2hRWzLmu_TMofjMYBPulgTS2I&e=
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list