[PATCH] D64632: [clang-format] Don't detect call to ObjC class method as C++11 attribute specifier
Robbie Gibson via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 15 01:51:33 PDT 2019
rkgibson2 updated this revision to Diff 209777.
rkgibson2 added a comment.
Add more tests
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64632/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64632
Files:
clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
Index: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -7027,6 +7027,12 @@
// On the other hand, we still need to correctly find array subscripts.
verifyFormat("int a = std::vector<int>{1, 2, 3}[0];");
+ // Make sure that we do not mistake Objective-C method inside array literals
+ // as attributes, even if those method names are also keywords.
+ verifyFormat("@[ [foo bar] ];");
+ verifyFormat("@[ [NSArray class] ];");
+ verifyFormat("@[ [foo enum] ];");
+
// Make sure we do not parse attributes as lambda introducers.
FormatStyle MultiLineFunctions = getLLVMStyle();
MultiLineFunctions.AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine = FormatStyle::SFS_None;
Index: clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
@@ -388,6 +388,10 @@
bool isCpp11AttributeSpecifier(const FormatToken &Tok) {
if (!Style.isCpp() || !Tok.startsSequence(tok::l_square, tok::l_square))
return false;
+ // The first square bracket is part of an ObjC array literal
+ if (Tok.Previous && Tok.Previous->is(tok::at)) {
+ return false;
+ }
const FormatToken *AttrTok = Tok.Next->Next;
if (!AttrTok)
return false;
@@ -400,7 +404,7 @@
while (AttrTok && !AttrTok->startsSequence(tok::r_square, tok::r_square)) {
// ObjC message send. We assume nobody will use : in a C++11 attribute
// specifier parameter, although this is technically valid:
- // [[foo(:)]]
+ // [[foo(:)]].
if (AttrTok->is(tok::colon) ||
AttrTok->startsSequence(tok::identifier, tok::identifier) ||
AttrTok->startsSequence(tok::r_paren, tok::identifier))
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D64632.209777.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1892 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20190715/a4fefbfb/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list