[PATCH] D64614: [clangd] Mark type hierarchy as a supported feature in the docs

[Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

sammccall accepted this revision.
sammccall added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clangd/Features.rst:264
 +-------------------------------------+------------+----------+
-| Type hierarchy                      | No         |   No     |
+| Type hierarchy                      | No         |   Yes    |
 +-------------------------------------+------------+----------+
----------------
nridge wrote:
> Should I perhaps change type hierarchy's entry in the LSP column from "No" to "Proposed"?
I'm not sure what "no" means, if it doesn't mean "proposed".

Changing the "no" links to say "proposal" and link to it would be useful, I think.
(And we could delete any rows that don't have a proposal)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614