[PATCH] D64614: [clangd] Mark type hierarchy as a supported feature in the docs
Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 12 02:28:49 PDT 2019
sammccall accepted this revision.
sammccall added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/docs/clangd/Features.rst:264
+-------------------------------------+------------+----------+
-| Type hierarchy | No | No |
+| Type hierarchy | No | Yes |
+-------------------------------------+------------+----------+
----------------
nridge wrote:
> Should I perhaps change type hierarchy's entry in the LSP column from "No" to "Proposed"?
I'm not sure what "no" means, if it doesn't mean "proposed".
Changing the "no" links to say "proposal" and link to it would be useful, I think.
(And we could delete any rows that don't have a proposal)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64614
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list