r364259 - [analyzer] ExprEngine: Escape pointers in bitwise operations
Csaba Dabis via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 24 17:44:33 PDT 2019
Author: charusso
Date: Mon Jun 24 17:44:33 2019
New Revision: 364259
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=364259&view=rev
Log:
[analyzer] ExprEngine: Escape pointers in bitwise operations
Summary:
After evaluation it would be an Unknown value and tracking would be lost.
Reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun, ravikandhadai, baloghadamsoftware, Szelethus
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: szepet, rnkovacs, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, donat.nagy,
dkrupp, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63720
Added:
cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/symbol-escape.cpp
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp?rev=364259&r1=364258&r2=364259&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineC.cpp Mon Jun 24 17:44:33 2019
@@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ void ExprEngine::VisitBinaryOperator(con
SVal Result = evalBinOp(state, Op, LeftV, RightV, B->getType());
if (!Result.isUnknown()) {
state = state->BindExpr(B, LCtx, Result);
+ } else {
+ // If we cannot evaluate the operation escape the operands.
+ state = escapeValue(state, LeftV, PSK_EscapeOther);
+ state = escapeValue(state, RightV, PSK_EscapeOther);
}
Bldr.generateNode(B, *it, state);
Added: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/symbol-escape.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/symbol-escape.cpp?rev=364259&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/symbol-escape.cpp (added)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/symbol-escape.cpp Mon Jun 24 17:44:33 2019
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks \
+// RUN: -verify %s
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics: Whenever we cannot evaluate an operation we escape
+// the operands. After the evaluation it would be an
+// Unknown value and the tracking would be lost.
+
+typedef unsigned __INTPTR_TYPE__ uintptr_t;
+
+class C {};
+
+C *simple_escape_in_bitwise_op(C *Foo) {
+ C *Bar = new C();
+ Bar = reinterpret_cast<C *>(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(Bar) & 0x1);
+ (void)Bar;
+ // no-warning: "Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'Bar'" was here.
+
+ return Bar;
+}
+
+C **indirect_escape_in_bitwise_op() {
+ C *Qux = new C();
+ C **Baz = &Qux;
+ Baz = reinterpret_cast<C **>(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(Baz) | 0x1);
+ Baz = reinterpret_cast<C **>(reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(Baz) &
+ ~static_cast<uintptr_t>(0x1));
+ // no-warning: "Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'Qux'" was here.
+
+ delete *Baz;
+ return Baz;
+}
+
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list