[PATCH] D62340: [clang-tidy] In TransformerClangTidyCheck, require Explanation field.

[Yitzhak Mandelbaum via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

ymandel added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/unittests/clang-tidy/TransformerClangTidyCheckTest.cpp:38
                                       " else ", statement(T))));
+  Rule.Cases[0].Explanation = tooling::text("no explanation");
+  return Rule;
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> NIT: this might be the first place people look at when writing the check, so we might want to provide a real explanation here.
> Something like `negate condition and revert then and else branches`
will do. But, realized this is a bit ugly so sent  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62390 to add support for the explanation to `makeRule`.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62340/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62340