[PATCH] D61970: [CodeGen][ObjC] Call objc_autoreleaseReturnValue and objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue instead of objc_autorelease and objc_retain in MRR
David Kilzer via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 15 21:07:58 PDT 2019
ddkilzer added a comment.
Had a couple questions about using `objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue` without a `return` statement. (I'm just reading this from a layman's point of view; it may not actually matter in practice.)
================
Comment at: test/CodeGenObjC/convert-messages-to-runtime-calls.m:32
// CALLS: {{call.*@objc_allocWithZone}}
- // CALLS: {{call.*@objc_retain}}
+ // CALLS-ARC-INTRINSICS: {{call.*@llvm.objc.retainAutoreleasedReturnValue}}
+ // CALLS-NO-ARC-INTRINSICS: {{call.*@objc_retain}}
----------------
Silly question: Should `objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue` really be called here when the value is not used in a `return` statement?
================
Comment at: test/CodeGenObjC/convert-messages-to-runtime-calls.m:169
// MSGS: {{call.*@objc_msgSend}}
- // CALLS: {{call.*@objc_retain}}
+ // CALLS-ARC-INTRINSICS: {{call.*@llvm.objc.retainAutoreleasedReturnValue}}
+ // CALLS-NO-ARC-INTRINSICS: {{call.*@objc_retain}}
----------------
Same silly question: Should `objc_retainAutoreleasedReturnValue` really be called here when the value is not used in a `return` statement?
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61970/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61970
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list