[PATCH] D61588: [clangd] Expose whether no-compile completion was used.
Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 6 04:56:10 PDT 2019
sammccall added a comment.
In D61588#1491728 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61588#1491728>, @kadircet wrote:
> We already have `CodeCompletion::Origin` which is (at least should be)set to `Identifier` in those cases. Is there a reason for not using it?
I'd forgotten about that. A couple I can think of:
- it's for each result, they want a result-set level flag (including when there are no results, possibly *because* we didn't parse)
- identifier completion doesn't inherently mean we didn't parse, that's just the case today. I think we're going to want to offer identifiers inside comments, e.g. https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/44
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61588/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61588
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list