[PATCH] D59665: Call to HandleNameConflict in VisitEnumDecl mistakeningly using Name instead of SearchName
Gabor Marton via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 22 02:50:49 PDT 2019
martong added a comment.
Hi Shafik,
Thank you for looking into this. This is indeed a bug, because whenever a we encounter an unnamed EnumDecl in the "from" context then we return with a nameconflict error.
However, I think we should fix this differently.
First of all, currently HandleNameConflict just returns the parameter `Name` it received. This may be unnamed in some cases and thus converts to true. So I think HandleNameConflict should be changed that it would return a default initialized DeclarationName; so once we have anything in the ConflictingDecls then we return with the NameConflict error:
DeclarationName ASTImporter::HandleNameConflict(DeclarationName Name,
DeclContext *DC,
unsigned IDNS,
NamedDecl **Decls,
unsigned NumDecls) {
- return Name;
+ return DeclarationName();
}
And most importantly, I think we should push into the ConflictingDecls only if the structural match indicates a non-match:
if (auto *FoundEnum = dyn_cast<EnumDecl>(FoundDecl)) {
if (isStructuralMatch(D, FoundEnum, true))
return Importer.MapImported(D, FoundEnum);
+ ConflictingDecls.push_back(FoundDecl);
}
-
- ConflictingDecls.push_back(FoundDecl);
I am aware of similar errors like this with other AST nodes. We had a patch in our fork to fix that in January (https://github.com/Ericsson/clang/pull/569/files) I am going to prepare a patch from that cause I see now this affects you guys in LLDB too.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59665/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59665
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list