[PATCH] D58161: Print a note to the called macro when diagnosing err_embedded_directive
Reid Kleckner via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Feb 13 13:11:15 PST 2019
rnk accepted this revision.
rnk added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
lgtm
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Lex/PPMacroExpansion.cpp:497
+
Args = ReadMacroCallArgumentList(Identifier, MI, ExpansionEnd);
----------------
thakis wrote:
> rnk wrote:
> > Can this re-enter, something like:
> > MACRO1(MACRO2(a1), MACRO3(
> > #include "asdf"
> > )
> > In this case, I think your diagnostic might do a null-deref. Maybe just add this test case and add a null test for it.
> This works fine:
>
> ```
> #define MACRO1(a, b, c)
> #define MACRO2(a, b, c)
> #define MACRO3(a, b, c)
>
> MACRO1(MACRO2(a1), MACRO3(
> #include "asdf"
> )
>
> $ out/gn/bin/clang -c test.cc
> test.cc:30:2: error: embedding a #include directive within macro arguments is not supported
> #include "asdf"
> ^
> test.cc:29:1: note: expansion of macro 'MACRO1' requested here
> MACRO1(MACRO2(a1), MACRO3(
> ^
> test.cc:29:1: error: unterminated function-like macro invocation
> MACRO1(MACRO2(a1), MACRO3(
> ^
> test.cc:25:9: note: macro 'MACRO1' defined here
> #define MACRO1(a, b, c)
> ^
> 2 errors generated.
> ```
>
> Note that the diag is only emitted if inMacroArgs is true, and ArgMacro is always set to non-nullptr exactly when that's true.
>
>
Right, so even if it could re-enter (sequence being "enter, enter, leave, directive, enter, leave, leave", we wouldn't emit this diagnostic, because InMacroArgs will be false.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58161/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D58161
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list