[PATCH] D57852: [clang-tidy] Don't use assignment for value-initialized enums
Jonas Toth via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 7 02:40:52 PST 2019
JonasToth added a comment.
How are the semantics for `enum class` in this case?
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/modernize-use-default-member-init-assignment.cpp:172
+ // CHECK-FIXES: PositiveValueEnum() {}
+ Enum e;
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:8: warning: use default member initializer for 'e'
----------------
What happens for the case `enum Enum { Foo = 3 }; /* ... */ : e() /* ... */`, is that even well formed?
I feel a testcase along those lines is missing.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57852/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57852
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list