[PATCH] D57230: [analyzer] Toning down invalidation a bit

[Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

NoQ added a comment.

In D57230#1372488 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372488>, @xazax.hun wrote:

> In D57230#1372275 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230#1372275>, @NoQ wrote:
>
> >
>
>
> Do you have success reducing false positives using creduce? My problem usually is that we cannot tell if a reduction rendered a false positive into a true positive.


False positives - no. Improvements and regressions - totally! Just run two different clangs in the creduce test and check that there's a difference in results.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D57230