r352079 - [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descriptor leak.

Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 25 16:29:49 PST 2019


Sorry to bring more bad news, but merging this seems to have regressed
a clangd test on the branch (I didn't notice at the time, because I
ran the wrong set of tests, d'oh).

I've searched my inbox but couldn't find any recent commits touching
the test. Do you have any idea what might be happening?

******************** TEST 'Extra Tools Unit Tests ::
clangd/./ClangdTests/GoToInclude.All' FAILED ********************
Note: Google Test filter = GoToInclude.All
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from GoToInclude
[ RUN      ] GoToInclude.All
/work/llvm-8/llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/unittests/clangd/XRefsTests.cpp:1086:
Failure
Value of: *Locations
Expected: has 1 element that file range ("/clangd-test/foo.h", 0:0-0:0)
  Actual: {}
/work/llvm-8/llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/unittests/clangd/XRefsTests.cpp:1096:
Failure
Value of: *Locations
Expected: has 1 element that file range ("/clangd-test/foo.h", 0:0-0:0)
  Actual: {}
/work/llvm-8/llvm/tools/clang/tools/extra/unittests/clangd/XRefsTests.cpp:1101:
Failure
Value of: *Locations
Expected: has 1 element that file range ("/clangd-test/foo.h", 0:0-0:0)
  Actual: {}
[  FAILED  ] GoToInclude.All (14 ms)
[----------] 1 test from GoToInclude (14 ms total)

[----------] Global test environment tear-down
[==========] 1 test from 1 test case ran. (14 ms total)
[  PASSED  ] 0 tests.
[  FAILED  ] 1 test, listed below:
[  FAILED  ] GoToInclude.All

 1 FAILED TEST
Updating file /clangd-test/foo.h with command [/clangd-test] clang
-ffreestanding /clangd-test/foo.h
Updating file /clangd-test/foo.cpp with command [/clangd-test] clang
-ffreestanding /clangd-test/foo.cpp
Preamble for file /clangd-test/foo.h cannot be reused. Attempting to rebuild it.
Preamble for file /clangd-test/foo.cpp cannot be reused. Attempting to
rebuild it.
Built preamble of size 169108 for file /clangd-test/foo.h
Built preamble of size 173056 for file /clangd-test/foo.cpp

********************
Testing Time: 5.30s
********************
Failing Tests (1):
    Extra Tools Unit Tests :: clangd/./ClangdTests/GoToInclude.All

  Expected Passes    : 1123
  Expected Failures  : 1
  Unsupported Tests  : 3
  Unexpected Failures: 1

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:18 AM Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Merged to 8.0 in r352225.
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:55 AM Sam McCall via cfe-commits
> <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Author: sammccall
> > Date: Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019
> > New Revision: 352079
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=352079&view=rev
> > Log:
> > [FileManager] Revert r347205 to avoid PCH file-descriptor leak.
> >
> > Summary:
> > r347205 fixed a bug in FileManager: first calling
> > getFile(shouldOpen=false) and then getFile(shouldOpen=true) results in
> > the file not being open.
> >
> > Unfortunately, some code was (inadvertently?) relying on this bug: when
> > building with a PCH, the file entries are obtained first by passing
> > shouldOpen=false, and then later shouldOpen=true, without any intention
> > of reading them. After r347205, they do get unneccesarily opened.
> > Aside from extra operations, this means they need to be closed. Normally
> > files are closed when their contents are read. As these files are never
> > read, they stay open until clang exits. On platforms with a low
> > open-files limit (e.g. Mac), this can lead to spurious file-not-found
> > errors when building large projects with PCH enabled, e.g.
> >   https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=924225
> >
> > Fixing the callsites to pass shouldOpen=false when the file won't be
> > read is not quite trivial (that info isn't available at the direct
> > callsite), and passing shouldOpen=false is a performance regression (it
> > results in open+fstat pairs being replaced by stat+open).
> >
> > So an ideal fix is going to be a little risky and we need some fix soon
> > (especially for the llvm 8 branch).
> > The problem addressed by r347205 is rare and has only been observed in
> > clangd. It was present in llvm-7, so we can live with it for now.
> >
> > Reviewers: bkramer, thakis
> >
> > Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, kadircet, cfe-commits
> >
> > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57165
> >
> > Added:
> >     cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles
> > Modified:
> >     cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h
> >     cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp
> >     cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp
> >
> > Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h?rev=352079&r1=352078&r2=352079&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019
> > @@ -69,15 +69,14 @@ class FileEntry {
> >    bool IsNamedPipe;
> >    bool InPCH;
> >    bool IsValid;               // Is this \c FileEntry initialized and valid?
> > -  bool DeferredOpen;          // Created by getFile(OpenFile=0); may open later.
> >
> >    /// The open file, if it is owned by the \p FileEntry.
> >    mutable std::unique_ptr<llvm::vfs::File> File;
> >
> >  public:
> >    FileEntry()
> > -      : UniqueID(0, 0), IsNamedPipe(false), InPCH(false), IsValid(false),
> > -        DeferredOpen(false) {}
> > +      : UniqueID(0, 0), IsNamedPipe(false), InPCH(false), IsValid(false)
> > +  {}
> >
> >    FileEntry(const FileEntry &) = delete;
> >    FileEntry &operator=(const FileEntry &) = delete;
> >
> > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp?rev=352079&r1=352078&r2=352079&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Basic/FileManager.cpp Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019
> > @@ -188,21 +188,15 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St
> >        *SeenFileEntries.insert(std::make_pair(Filename, nullptr)).first;
> >
> >    // See if there is already an entry in the map.
> > -  if (NamedFileEnt.second) {
> > -    if (NamedFileEnt.second == NON_EXISTENT_FILE)
> > -      return nullptr;
> > -    // Entry exists: return it *unless* it wasn't opened and open is requested.
> > -    if (!(NamedFileEnt.second->DeferredOpen && openFile))
> > -      return NamedFileEnt.second;
> > -    // We previously stat()ed the file, but didn't open it: do that below.
> > -    // FIXME: the below does other redundant work too (stats the dir and file).
> > -  } else {
> > -    // By default, initialize it to invalid.
> > -    NamedFileEnt.second = NON_EXISTENT_FILE;
> > -  }
> > +  if (NamedFileEnt.second)
> > +    return NamedFileEnt.second == NON_EXISTENT_FILE ? nullptr
> > +                                                    : NamedFileEnt.second;
> >
> >    ++NumFileCacheMisses;
> >
> > +  // By default, initialize it to invalid.
> > +  NamedFileEnt.second = NON_EXISTENT_FILE;
> > +
> >    // Get the null-terminated file name as stored as the key of the
> >    // SeenFileEntries map.
> >    StringRef InterndFileName = NamedFileEnt.first();
> > @@ -240,7 +234,6 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St
> >    // It exists.  See if we have already opened a file with the same inode.
> >    // This occurs when one dir is symlinked to another, for example.
> >    FileEntry &UFE = UniqueRealFiles[Data.UniqueID];
> > -  UFE.DeferredOpen = !openFile;
> >
> >    NamedFileEnt.second = &UFE;
> >
> > @@ -257,15 +250,6 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St
> >      InterndFileName = NamedFileEnt.first().data();
> >    }
> >
> > -  // If we opened the file for the first time, record the resulting info.
> > -  // Do this even if the cache entry was valid, maybe we didn't previously open.
> > -  if (F && !UFE.File) {
> > -    if (auto PathName = F->getName())
> > -      fillRealPathName(&UFE, *PathName);
> > -    UFE.File = std::move(F);
> > -    assert(!UFE.DeferredOpen && "we just opened it!");
> > -  }
> > -
> >    if (UFE.isValid()) { // Already have an entry with this inode, return it.
> >
> >      // FIXME: this hack ensures that if we look up a file by a virtual path in
> > @@ -296,9 +280,13 @@ const FileEntry *FileManager::getFile(St
> >    UFE.UniqueID = Data.UniqueID;
> >    UFE.IsNamedPipe = Data.IsNamedPipe;
> >    UFE.InPCH = Data.InPCH;
> > +  UFE.File = std::move(F);
> >    UFE.IsValid = true;
> > -  // Note File and DeferredOpen were initialized above.
> >
> > +  if (UFE.File) {
> > +    if (auto PathName = UFE.File->getName())
> > +      fillRealPathName(&UFE, *PathName);
> > +  }
> >    return &UFE;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -370,7 +358,6 @@ FileManager::getVirtualFile(StringRef Fi
> >    UFE->UID     = NextFileUID++;
> >    UFE->IsValid = true;
> >    UFE->File.reset();
> > -  UFE->DeferredOpen = false;
> >    return UFE;
> >  }
> >
> >
> > Added: cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles?rev=352079&view=auto
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles (added)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/test/PCH/leakfiles Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +// Test that compiling using a PCH doesn't leak file descriptors.
> > +// https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=924225
> > +//
> > +// This test requires bash loops and ulimit.
> > +// REQUIRES: shell
> > +// UNSUPPORTED: win32
> > +//
> > +// Set up source files. lib/lib.h includes lots of lib*.h files in that dir.
> > +// client.c includes lib/lib.h, and also the individual files directly.
> > +//
> > +// RUN: rm -rf %t
> > +// RUN: mkdir %t
> > +// RUN: cd %t
> > +// RUN: mkdir lib
> > +// RUN: for i in {1..300}; do touch lib/lib$i.h; done
> > +// RUN: for i in {1..300}; do echo "#include \"lib$i.h\"" >> lib/lib.h; done
> > +// RUN: echo "#include \"lib/lib.h\"" > client.c
> > +// RUN: for i in {1..300}; do echo "#include \"lib/lib$i.h\"" >> client.c; done
> > +//
> > +// We want to verify that we don't hold all the files open at the same time.
> > +// This is important e.g. on mac, which has a low default FD limit.
> > +// RUN: ulimit -n 100
> > +//
> > +// Test without PCH.
> > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Ilib/ client.c
> > +//
> > +// Test with PCH.
> > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-pch -o pch -Ilib/ client.c
> > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -include-pch pch -Ilib/ client.c -fsyntax-only
> >
> > Modified: cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp?rev=352079&r1=352078&r2=352079&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/unittests/Basic/FileManagerTest.cpp Thu Jan 24 10:55:24 2019
> > @@ -221,33 +221,6 @@ TEST_F(FileManagerTest, getFileReturnsNU
> >    EXPECT_EQ(nullptr, file);
> >  }
> >
> > -// When calling getFile(OpenFile=false); getFile(OpenFile=true) the file is
> > -// opened for the second call.
> > -TEST_F(FileManagerTest, getFileDefersOpen) {
> > -  llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem> FS(
> > -      new llvm::vfs::InMemoryFileSystem());
> > -  FS->addFile("/tmp/test", 0, llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy("test"));
> > -  FS->addFile("/tmp/testv", 0, llvm::MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy("testv"));
> > -  FileManager manager(options, FS);
> > -
> > -  const FileEntry *file = manager.getFile("/tmp/test", /*OpenFile=*/false);
> > -  ASSERT_TRUE(file != nullptr);
> > -  ASSERT_TRUE(file->isValid());
> > -  // "real path name" reveals whether the file was actually opened.
> > -  EXPECT_FALSE(file->isOpenForTests());
> > -
> > -  file = manager.getFile("/tmp/test", /*OpenFile=*/true);
> > -  ASSERT_TRUE(file != nullptr);
> > -  ASSERT_TRUE(file->isValid());
> > -  EXPECT_TRUE(file->isOpenForTests());
> > -
> > -  // However we should never try to open a file previously opened as virtual.
> > -  ASSERT_TRUE(manager.getVirtualFile("/tmp/testv", 5, 0));
> > -  ASSERT_TRUE(manager.getFile("/tmp/testv", /*OpenFile=*/false));
> > -  file = manager.getFile("/tmp/testv", /*OpenFile=*/true);
> > -  EXPECT_FALSE(file->isOpenForTests());
> > -}
> > -
> >  // The following tests apply to Unix-like system only.
> >
> >  #ifndef _WIN32
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-commits mailing list
> > cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list