[PATCH] D56624: [Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls

[Julian Lettner via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

yln added a comment.

Seems as if we reached consensus! :)  I will change the revision to use an intrinsic.

Before I start doing that, just one more quick idea:
Would it work if UBsan directly inserts calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` (of course only when ASan is requested). Similar to how it inserts calls to it's own runtime functions (e.g., `__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable`).
If we strive for the "simplest" solution... but maybe I am missing something in this is too simple?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624