r329804 - [Sema] Fix built-in decrement operator overload resolution
Jan Korous via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Apr 12 07:20:13 PDT 2018
Hi Richard,
Here you are:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45569 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D45569>
I am now thinking if it makes sense to output this warning for pre-17 standards:
warning: incrementing expression of type bool is deprecated and incompatible with C++17
Produced in:
SemaExpr.cpp
static QualType CheckIncrementDecrementOperand
// Increment of bool sets it to true, but is deprecated.
S.Diag(OpLoc, S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus17 ? diag::ext_increment_bool
: diag::warn_increment_bool)
What do you think?
Jan
> On 11 Apr 2018, at 15:19, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> While you're here... ++ should not be available for bool in C++17 onwards. :)
>
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 14:39 Jan Korous via cfe-commits, <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> Author: jkorous
> Date: Wed Apr 11 06:36:29 2018
> New Revision: 329804
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=329804&view=rev <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=329804&view=rev>
> Log:
> [Sema] Fix built-in decrement operator overload resolution
>
> C++ [over.built] p4:
>
> "For every pair (T, VQ), where T is an arithmetic type other than bool, and VQ is either volatile or empty, there exist candidate operator functions of the form
>
> VQ T& operator--(VQ T&);
> T operator--(VQ T&, int);
> "
> The bool type is in position LastPromotedIntegralType in BuiltinOperatorOverloadBuilder::getArithmeticType::ArithmeticTypes, but addPlusPlusMinusMinusArithmeticOverloads() was expecting it at position 0.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44988 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D44988>
>
> rdar://problem/34255516
>
> Modified:
> cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
> cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp?rev=329804&r1=329803&r2=329804&view=diff <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp?rev=329804&r1=329803&r2=329804&view=diff>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp Wed Apr 11 06:36:29 2018
> @@ -7796,10 +7796,12 @@ public:
> if (!HasArithmeticOrEnumeralCandidateType)
> return;
>
> - for (unsigned Arith = (Op == OO_PlusPlus? 0 : 1);
> - Arith < NumArithmeticTypes; ++Arith) {
> + for (unsigned Arith = 0; Arith < NumArithmeticTypes; ++Arith) {
> + const auto TypeOfT = ArithmeticTypes[Arith];
> + if (Op == OO_MinusMinus && TypeOfT == S.Context.BoolTy)
> + continue;
> addPlusPlusMinusMinusStyleOverloads(
> - ArithmeticTypes[Arith],
> + TypeOfT,
> VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasVolatile(),
> VisibleTypeConversionsQuals.hasRestrict());
> }
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp?rev=329804&r1=329803&r2=329804&view=diff <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp?rev=329804&r1=329803&r2=329804&view=diff>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-builtin-operators.cpp Wed Apr 11 06:36:29 2018
> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ void f(Short s, Long l, Enum1 e1, Enum2
> // FIXME: should pass (void)static_cast<no&>(islong(e1 % e2));
> }
>
> +struct BoolRef {
> + operator bool&();
> +};
> +
> struct ShortRef { // expected-note{{candidate function (the implicit copy assignment operator) not viable}}
> #if __cplusplus >= 201103L // C++11 or later
> // expected-note at -2 {{candidate function (the implicit move assignment operator) not viable}}
> @@ -73,6 +77,10 @@ struct LongRef {
> operator volatile long&();
> };
>
> +struct FloatRef {
> + operator float&();
> +};
> +
> struct XpmfRef { // expected-note{{candidate function (the implicit copy assignment operator) not viable}}
> #if __cplusplus >= 201103L // C++11 or later
> // expected-note at -2 {{candidate function (the implicit move assignment operator) not viable}}
> @@ -84,13 +92,19 @@ struct E2Ref {
> operator E2&();
> };
>
> -void g(ShortRef sr, LongRef lr, E2Ref e2_ref, XpmfRef pmf_ref) {
> +void g(BoolRef br, ShortRef sr, LongRef lr, FloatRef fr, E2Ref e2_ref, XpmfRef pmf_ref) {
> // C++ [over.built]p3
> short s1 = sr++;
>
> - // C++ [over.built]p3
> + // C++ [over.built]p4
> long l1 = lr--;
>
> + // C++ [over.built]p4
> + float f1 = fr--;
> +
> + // C++ [over.built]p4
> + bool b2 = br--; // expected-error{{cannot decrement value of type 'BoolRef'}}
> +
> // C++ [over.built]p18
> short& sr1 = (sr *= lr);
> volatile long& lr1 = (lr *= sr);
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20180412/329c9d68/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list