[PATCH] D35338: Add the -fdestroy-globals flag

[Nico Weber via cfe-commits]

I'd love to use this flag in non-firmware code FWIW.

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Ian Tessier via Phabricator via
cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> itessier added a comment.
>
> > That seems like a nice win and I like the convenience of this approach.
> That said I've just remembered that there's a thread on cfe-dev about this:
> > [RFC] Suppress C++ static destructor registration
> > I don't think a consensus was reached. From what I gather, some people
> think that the convenience of this flag makes it worth adding to clang,
> while others think that adding a non-standard compiler-specific flag is
> asking for trouble.
>
> Given that firmware is a much different (or controlled) environment than a
> binary running on a full blown OS, would it be acceptable to name the flag
> -fbaremetal-destroy-globals, and only allow its use if the target triple's
> OS is set to none (e.g.: arm-**none**-eabi)?
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D35338
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20180126/ffa7807e/attachment.html>