[PATCH] D35538: [CodeGen][ARM] ARM runtime helper functions are not always soft-fp

[Saleem Abdulrasool via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

compnerd added a comment.

I think that the approach is reasonable.  However, the test needs tweaking.  The function and the call both are ambiguous in the match.  Can you match the call sequence?  Or explicitly the local label and then the call.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D35538