[PATCH] D25678: [modules] Do not report missing definitions of demoted constexpr variable templates.This is a followup to regression introduced in r284284.This should fix our libstdc++ modules builds.

Richard Smith via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 18 10:49:46 PDT 2016


rsmith added inline comments.


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:10129
+        !Var->isThisDeclarationADemotedDefinition()) {
+      assert(Var->isThisDeclarationADemotedDefinition() && getLangOpts().Modules
+             && "Demoting decls is only in the contest of modules!");
----------------
v.g.vassilev wrote:
> manmanren wrote:
> > Is the logic correct here? The if statement says !Var->isThisDeclarationADemotedDefinition(), and we then assert Var->isThisDeclarationADemotedDefinition() && getLangOpts().Modules.
> Oops, that is an old version of the patch. Uploading the new one.
Can you just remove this assertion entirely? I don't see why it's relevant to what this code is checking. If we had some other reason to demote, the logic here would still seem to be correct.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D25678





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list