[PATCH] D24599: Add 'inline' but not _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to basic_string's destructor

Marshall Clow via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 15 10:55:30 PDT 2016

Previous message: [PATCH] D24599: Add 'inline' but not _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to basic_string's destructor
Next message: [PATCH] D24599: Add 'inline' but not _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to basic_string's destructor
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

mclow.lists added a comment.

Any reason we shouldn't just revert r280944, wait for the LLVM bug to be fixed, and then re-apply it?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D24599

Previous message: [PATCH] D24599: Add 'inline' but not _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to basic_string's destructor
Next message: [PATCH] D24599: Add 'inline' but not _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to basic_string's destructor
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list