r256468 - On {mips, mipsel, mips64, mips64el}-freebsd, we need to pass any -G option to the assembler.

[Daniel Sanders via cfe-commits]

Did you get an answer to this question? I think it's just that the FreeBSD class hasn't refactored to that style yet.
That switch statement is getting quite large so it would be a nice cleanup to switch to that style.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cfe-commits [mailto:cfe-commits-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf
> Of Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits
> Sent: 27 December 2015 11:59
> To: cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: r256468 - On {mips, mipsel, mips64, mips64el}-freebsd, we need
> to pass any -G option to the assembler.
> 
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:36:44AM -0000, Dimitry Andric via cfe-commits
> wrote:
> > Author: dim
> > Date: Sun Dec 27 04:36:44 2015
> > New Revision: 256468
> >
> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=256468&view=rev
> > Log:
> > On {mips,mipsel,mips64,mips64el}-freebsd, we need to pass any -G option
> to the assembler.
> 
> Why is this reinventing the wheel and not using AddMIPSTargetArgs?
> 
> Joerg
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits