[PATCH] D11908: Clang support for -fthinlto.

[Diego Novillo via cfe-commits]

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Teresa Johnson via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

As David mentioned, "inlineonly" is much too restrictive for what is
> possible. I prefer to stick with "thin" since it refers to this new model
> of keeping the whole program part very thin.
>

Agreed.  "inlineonly" is too restrictive.


> Does anyone have an opinion on "full" vs "monolithic" vs something else
> for the traditional full/monolithic LTO?
>


I prefer Full LTO for the traditional mechanism (or even Traditional LTO).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20151002/3aebc5c1/attachment.html>