r247303 - Debug Info: Remove an unnecessary debug type visitor.

David Blaikie via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 10 10:18:24 PDT 2015


On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Author: adrian
> Date: Thu Sep 10 12:13:31 2015
> New Revision: 247303
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247303&view=rev
> Log:
> Debug Info: Remove an unnecessary debug type visitor.
> Thanks to dblaikie for spotting this.
>
> Modified:
>     cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations.cpp
>     cfe/trunk/test/Modules/ModuleDebugInfo.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations.cpp?rev=247303&r1=247302&r2=247303&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ObjectFilePCHContainerOperations.cpp Thu Sep 10
> 12:13:31 2015
> @@ -70,13 +70,6 @@ class PCHContainerGenerator : public AST
>        return true;
>      }
>
> -    bool VisitValueDecl(ValueDecl *D) {
> -      QualType QualTy = D->getType();
> -      if (!QualTy.isNull() && CanRepresent(QualTy.getTypePtr()))
> -        DI.getOrCreateStandaloneType(QualTy, D->getLocation());
> -      return true;
> -    }
> -
>      bool VisitObjCInterfaceDecl(ObjCInterfaceDecl *D) {
>        QualType QualTy(D->getTypeForDecl(), 0);
>        if (!QualTy.isNull() && CanRepresent(QualTy.getTypePtr()))
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Modules/ModuleDebugInfo.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Modules/ModuleDebugInfo.cpp?rev=247303&r1=247302&r2=247303&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Modules/ModuleDebugInfo.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Modules/ModuleDebugInfo.cpp Thu Sep 10 12:13:31 2015
> @@ -7,10 +7,12 @@
>  // RUN: rm -rf %t
>  // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -x objective-c++
> -std=c++11 -g -fmodules -fmodule-format=obj -fimplicit-module-maps
> -DMODULES -fmodules-cache-path=%t %s -I %S/Inputs -I %t -emit-llvm -o %t.ll
> -mllvm -debug-only=pchcontainer &>%t-mod.ll
>  // RUN: cat %t-mod.ll | FileCheck %s
> +// RUN: cat %t-mod.ll | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NEG %s
>
>  // PCH:
>  // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -x c++ -std=c++11
> -emit-pch -fmodule-format=obj -I %S/Inputs -o %t.pch %S/Inputs/DebugCXX.h
> -mllvm -debug-only=pchcontainer &>%t-pch.ll
>  // RUN: cat %t-pch.ll | FileCheck %s
> +// RUN: cat %t-mod.ll | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NEG %s
>
>  #ifdef MODULES
>  @import DebugCXX;
> @@ -30,12 +32,11 @@
>  // CHECK: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_class_type,
>  // CHECK-SAME:             name: "Template<float, DebugCXX::traits<float>
> >"
>  // CHECK-SAME:             identifier:
> "_ZTSN8DebugCXX8TemplateIfNS_6traitsIfEEEE")
> -// CHECK: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_class_type,
> -// CHECK-SAME:             name: "Template<long, DebugCXX::traits<long> >"
> -// CHECK-SAME:             identifier:
> "_ZTSN8DebugCXX8TemplateIlNS_6traitsIlEEEE")
>  // CHECK: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_class_type, name: "A<void>"
>  // CHECK-SAME:             identifier: "_ZTSN8DebugCXX1AIJvEEE")
>  // CHECK: !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "FloatInstatiation"
>  // no mangled name here yet.
>  // CHECK: !DIDerivedType(tag: DW_TAG_typedef, name: "B",
>  // no mangled name here yet.
> +
> +// CHECK-NEG-NOT: "_ZTSN8DebugCXX8TemplateIlNS_6traitsIlEEEE"
>

Rather than using a separate check - maybe do the same sort of thing we do
for DWARF testing, CHECK-NOT between each DICompositeType, to ensure we
only get the types we intended? (including a CHECK-NOT at the end to ensure
there aren't any trailing ones)

But also: How does the current implementation avoid emitting this type? I
thought it visited all the type decls, even those not immediately in the
module? (you mentioned that was something that you were planning to address
in a future patch) Is that not the case? Is this now sufficient to only
emit the decls immediately in this module?


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20150910/ada6aa18/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list