[PATCH] C++1y is now C++14

[Bill Wendling]

Fine. I hate deadlines too. They only get in the way of releasing on time.

-bw

On Aug 20, 2014, at 7:40 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:

> For the avoidance of doubt, the attached patch is the proposed change. It's a minimal change that merely adds '-std=c++14' as an alias for '-std=c++1y' and adds '-std=gnu++14' as an alias for '-std=gnu++1y'. I think it'd be a significant missed opportunity for our first release after C++14 is standardized to not have this flag (we've been C++14 feature complete since January).
> 
> Tom: If we're going to have a 3.4.3 point release, I'd suggest applying this patch there too.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> Really?
> 
> I would really like to see this. It's totally safe, and we actually had full C++14 support *well* before the branch.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> I know that ’14 is out now, but that happened after the branching. I don’t even know if we’re promising full c++14 support in this. Let’s just wait until the next release.
> 
> -bw
> 
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On 19 Aug 2014 08:55, "Aaron Ballman" <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> LGTM, thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> It looks like you didn't add -std=gnu++14. Is there a reason for that?
> >>>> It
> >>>> seems useful, even if GCC doesn't support it yet.
> >>>
> >>> I wasn't certain whether we wanted it. I will add it in.
> >>>
> >>>> Also, I spied a CXX1YCOMPAT macro in one of the tests you updated :)
> >>>
> >>> I will double-check that and fix before committing.
> >>>
> >>> Blind curiosity, is this something we want for the release? Or has
> >>> that ship sailed?
> >>
> >> If Bill is amenable, adding just the -std=c++14 change directly to the
> >> branch (and none of the other renaming) seems like a good idea to me.
> >
> > Bill, what are your thoughts on this idea?
> >
> > ~Aaron
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
> 
> 
> <cxx14.patch>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140822/0e0fd581/attachment.html>