<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Fine. I hate deadlines too. They only get in the way of releasing on time.<div><br></div><div>-bw</div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 20, 2014, at 7:40 PM, Richard Smith <<a href="mailto:richard@metafoo.co.uk">richard@metafoo.co.uk</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">For the avoidance of doubt, the attached patch is the proposed change. It's a minimal change that merely adds '-std=c++14' as an alias for '-std=c++1y' and adds '-std=gnu++14' as an alias for '-std=gnu++1y'. I think it'd be a significant missed opportunity for our first release after C++14 is standardized to not have this flag (we've been C++14 feature complete since January).<br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>Tom: If we're going to have a 3.4.3 point release, I'd suggest applying this patch there too.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Chandler Carruth <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chandlerc@google.com" target="_blank">chandlerc@google.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Really?<div><br></div><div>I would really like to see this. It's totally safe, and we actually had full C++14 support *well* before the branch.</div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Bill Wendling <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:isanbard@gmail.com" target="_blank">isanbard@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
I know that ’14 is out now, but that happened after the branching. I don’t even know if we’re promising full c++14 support in this. Let’s just wait until the next release.<br>
<span><font color="#888888"><br>
-bw<br>
</font></span></div><div><div><br>
On Aug 19, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Aaron Ballman <<a href="mailto:aaron@aaronballman.com" target="_blank">aaron@aaronballman.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Richard Smith <<a href="mailto:richard@metafoo.co.uk" target="_blank">richard@metafoo.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
>> On 19 Aug 2014 08:55, "Aaron Ballman" <<a href="mailto:aaron@aaronballman.com" target="_blank">aaron@aaronballman.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Richard Smith <<a href="mailto:richard@metafoo.co.uk" target="_blank">richard@metafoo.co.uk</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>>> LGTM, thanks!<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> It looks like you didn't add -std=gnu++14. Is there a reason for that?<br>
>>>> It<br>
>>>> seems useful, even if GCC doesn't support it yet.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I wasn't certain whether we wanted it. I will add it in.<br>
>>><br>
>>>> Also, I spied a CXX1YCOMPAT macro in one of the tests you updated :)<br>
>>><br>
>>> I will double-check that and fix before committing.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Blind curiosity, is this something we want for the release? Or has<br>
>>> that ship sailed?<br>
>><br>
>> If Bill is amenable, adding just the -std=c++14 change directly to the<br>
>> branch (and none of the other renaming) seems like a good idea to me.<br>
><br>
> Bill, what are your thoughts on this idea?<br>
><br>
> ~Aaron<br>
<br>
<br></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
cfe-commits mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu" target="_blank">cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits" target="_blank">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>
<span><cxx14.patch></span></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>