r210369 - Fix DOS-style newlines.

Eli Bendersky eliben at google.com
Fri Jun 6 13:31:48 PDT 2014


Author: eliben
Date: Fri Jun  6 15:31:48 2014
New Revision: 210369

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=210369&view=rev
Log:
Fix DOS-style newlines.

A previous patch r210330 (and possibly another) introduced DOS-style newlines
into a UNIX newline formatted file. 

Patch by Mark Heffernan (http://reviews.llvm.org/D4046)


Modified:
    cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
    cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td
    cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
    cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParsePragma.cpp
    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/class-layout.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td?rev=210369&r1=210368&r2=210369&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td Fri Jun  6 15:31:48 2014
@@ -1757,53 +1757,53 @@ def MSVtorDisp : InheritableAttr {
   let Documentation = [Undocumented];
 }
 
-def Unaligned : IgnoredAttr {
-  let Spellings = [Keyword<"__unaligned">];
-}
-
-def LoopHint : Attr {
-  /// vectorize: vectorizes loop operations if 'value != 0'.
-  /// vectorize_width: vectorize loop operations with width 'value'.
-  /// interleave: interleave multiple loop iterations if 'value != 0'.
-  /// interleave_count: interleaves 'value' loop interations.
-
-  /// FIXME: Add Pragma spelling to tablegen and
-  /// use it here.
-  let Spellings = [Keyword<"loop">];
-
-  /// State of the loop optimization specified by the spelling.
-  let Args = [EnumArgument<"Option", "OptionType",
-                          ["vectorize", "vectorize_width", "interleave", "interleave_count"],
-                          ["Vectorize", "VectorizeWidth", "Interleave", "InterleaveCount"]>,
-              DefaultIntArgument<"Value", 1>];
-
-  let AdditionalMembers = [{
-  static StringRef getOptionName(int Option) {
-    switch(Option) {
-    case Vectorize: return "vectorize";
-    case VectorizeWidth: return "vectorize_width";
-    case Interleave: return "interleave";
-    case InterleaveCount: return "interleave_count";
-    }
-    llvm_unreachable("Unhandled LoopHint option.");
-  }
-
-  static StringRef getValueName(int Value) {
-    if (Value)
-      return "enable";
-    return "disable";
-  }
-
-  // FIXME: Modify pretty printer to print this pragma.
-  void print(raw_ostream &OS, const PrintingPolicy &Policy) const {
-    OS << "#pragma clang loop " << getOptionName(option) << "(";
-    if (option == VectorizeWidth || option == InterleaveCount)
-      OS << value;
-    else
-      OS << getValueName(value);
-    OS << ")\n";
-  }
-  }];
-
-  let Documentation = [Undocumented];
-}
+def Unaligned : IgnoredAttr {
+  let Spellings = [Keyword<"__unaligned">];
+}
+
+def LoopHint : Attr {
+  /// vectorize: vectorizes loop operations if 'value != 0'.
+  /// vectorize_width: vectorize loop operations with width 'value'.
+  /// interleave: interleave multiple loop iterations if 'value != 0'.
+  /// interleave_count: interleaves 'value' loop interations.
+
+  /// FIXME: Add Pragma spelling to tablegen and
+  /// use it here.
+  let Spellings = [Keyword<"loop">];
+
+  /// State of the loop optimization specified by the spelling.
+  let Args = [EnumArgument<"Option", "OptionType",
+                          ["vectorize", "vectorize_width", "interleave", "interleave_count"],
+                          ["Vectorize", "VectorizeWidth", "Interleave", "InterleaveCount"]>,
+              DefaultIntArgument<"Value", 1>];
+
+  let AdditionalMembers = [{
+  static StringRef getOptionName(int Option) {
+    switch(Option) {
+    case Vectorize: return "vectorize";
+    case VectorizeWidth: return "vectorize_width";
+    case Interleave: return "interleave";
+    case InterleaveCount: return "interleave_count";
+    }
+    llvm_unreachable("Unhandled LoopHint option.");
+  }
+
+  static StringRef getValueName(int Value) {
+    if (Value)
+      return "enable";
+    return "disable";
+  }
+
+  // FIXME: Modify pretty printer to print this pragma.
+  void print(raw_ostream &OS, const PrintingPolicy &Policy) const {
+    OS << "#pragma clang loop " << getOptionName(option) << "(";
+    if (option == VectorizeWidth || option == InterleaveCount)
+      OS << value;
+    else
+      OS << getValueName(value);
+    OS << ")\n";
+  }
+  }];
+
+  let Documentation = [Undocumented];
+}

Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td?rev=210369&r1=210368&r2=210369&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td Fri Jun  6 15:31:48 2014
@@ -889,16 +889,16 @@ def err_omp_unexpected_directive : Error
 def err_omp_expected_punc : Error<
   "expected ',' or ')' in '%0' clause">;
 def err_omp_unexpected_clause : Error<
-  "unexpected OpenMP clause '%0' in directive '#pragma omp %1'">;
-def err_omp_more_one_clause : Error<
-  "directive '#pragma omp %0' cannot contain more than one '%1' clause">;
-
-// Pragma loop support.
-def err_pragma_loop_invalid_option : Error<
-  "%select{invalid|missing}0 option%select{ %1|}0; expected vectorize, vectorize_width, interleave, or interleave_count">;
-} // end of Parse Issue category.
-
-let CategoryName = "Modules Issue" in {
+  "unexpected OpenMP clause '%0' in directive '#pragma omp %1'">;
+def err_omp_more_one_clause : Error<
+  "directive '#pragma omp %0' cannot contain more than one '%1' clause">;
+
+// Pragma loop support.
+def err_pragma_loop_invalid_option : Error<
+  "%select{invalid|missing}0 option%select{ %1|}0; expected vectorize, vectorize_width, interleave, or interleave_count">;
+} // end of Parse Issue category.
+
+let CategoryName = "Modules Issue" in {
 def err_module_expected_ident : Error<
   "expected a module name after module import">;
 def err_module_expected_semi : Error<

Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td?rev=210369&r1=210368&r2=210369&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td Fri Jun  6 15:31:48 2014
@@ -539,21 +539,21 @@ def err_pragma_push_visibility_mismatch
 def note_surrounding_namespace_ends_here : Note<
   "surrounding namespace with visibility attribute ends here">;
 def err_pragma_pop_visibility_mismatch : Error<
-  "#pragma visibility pop with no matching #pragma visibility push">;
-def note_surrounding_namespace_starts_here : Note<
-  "surrounding namespace with visibility attribute starts here">;
-def err_pragma_loop_invalid_value : Error<
-  "%select{invalid|missing}0 value%select{ %1|}0; expected a positive integer value">;
-def err_pragma_loop_invalid_keyword : Error<
-  "%select{invalid|missing}0 keyword%select{ %1|}0; expected 'enable' or 'disable'">;
-def err_pragma_loop_compatibility : Error<
-  "%select{incompatible|duplicate}0 directives '%1(%2)' and '%3(%4)'">;
-def err_pragma_loop_precedes_nonloop : Error<
-  "expected a for, while, or do-while loop to follow the '#pragma clang loop' "
-  "directive">;
-
-/// Objective-C parser diagnostics
-def err_duplicate_class_def : Error<
+  "#pragma visibility pop with no matching #pragma visibility push">;
+def note_surrounding_namespace_starts_here : Note<
+  "surrounding namespace with visibility attribute starts here">;
+def err_pragma_loop_invalid_value : Error<
+  "%select{invalid|missing}0 value%select{ %1|}0; expected a positive integer value">;
+def err_pragma_loop_invalid_keyword : Error<
+  "%select{invalid|missing}0 keyword%select{ %1|}0; expected 'enable' or 'disable'">;
+def err_pragma_loop_compatibility : Error<
+  "%select{incompatible|duplicate}0 directives '%1(%2)' and '%3(%4)'">;
+def err_pragma_loop_precedes_nonloop : Error<
+  "expected a for, while, or do-while loop to follow the '#pragma clang loop' "
+  "directive">;
+
+/// Objective-C parser diagnostics
+def err_duplicate_class_def : Error<
   "duplicate interface definition for class %0">;
 def err_undef_superclass : Error<
   "cannot find interface declaration for %0, superclass of %1">;

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParsePragma.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParsePragma.cpp?rev=210369&r1=210368&r2=210369&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParsePragma.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Parse/ParsePragma.cpp Fri Jun  6 15:31:48 2014
@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 #include "RAIIObjectsForParser.h"
-#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
-#include "clang/Parse/ParseDiagnostic.h"
-#include "clang/Parse/Parser.h"
-#include "clang/Sema/LoopHint.h"
-#include "clang/Sema/Scope.h"
-#include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h"
-using namespace clang;
+#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
+#include "clang/Parse/ParseDiagnostic.h"
+#include "clang/Parse/Parser.h"
+#include "clang/Sema/LoopHint.h"
+#include "clang/Sema/Scope.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h"
+using namespace clang;
 
 namespace {
 
@@ -139,18 +139,18 @@ struct PragmaOptimizeHandler : public Pr
   void HandlePragma(Preprocessor &PP, PragmaIntroducerKind Introducer,
                     Token &FirstToken) override;
 private:
-  Sema &Actions;
-};
-
-struct PragmaLoopHintHandler : public PragmaHandler {
-  PragmaLoopHintHandler() : PragmaHandler("loop") {}
-  void HandlePragma(Preprocessor &PP, PragmaIntroducerKind Introducer,
-                    Token &FirstToken) override;
-};
-
-}  // end namespace
-
-void Parser::initializePragmaHandlers() {
+  Sema &Actions;
+};
+
+struct PragmaLoopHintHandler : public PragmaHandler {
+  PragmaLoopHintHandler() : PragmaHandler("loop") {}
+  void HandlePragma(Preprocessor &PP, PragmaIntroducerKind Introducer,
+                    Token &FirstToken) override;
+};
+
+}  // end namespace
+
+void Parser::initializePragmaHandlers() {
   AlignHandler.reset(new PragmaAlignHandler());
   PP.AddPragmaHandler(AlignHandler.get());
 
@@ -212,15 +212,15 @@ void Parser::initializePragmaHandlers()
     MSSection.reset(new PragmaMSPragma("section"));
     PP.AddPragmaHandler(MSSection.get());
   }
-
-  OptimizeHandler.reset(new PragmaOptimizeHandler(Actions));
-  PP.AddPragmaHandler("clang", OptimizeHandler.get());
-
-  LoopHintHandler.reset(new PragmaLoopHintHandler());
-  PP.AddPragmaHandler("clang", LoopHintHandler.get());
-}
-
-void Parser::resetPragmaHandlers() {
+
+  OptimizeHandler.reset(new PragmaOptimizeHandler(Actions));
+  PP.AddPragmaHandler("clang", OptimizeHandler.get());
+
+  LoopHintHandler.reset(new PragmaLoopHintHandler());
+  PP.AddPragmaHandler("clang", LoopHintHandler.get());
+}
+
+void Parser::resetPragmaHandlers() {
   // Remove the pragma handlers we installed.
   PP.RemovePragmaHandler(AlignHandler.get());
   AlignHandler.reset();
@@ -272,15 +272,15 @@ void Parser::resetPragmaHandlers() {
 
   PP.RemovePragmaHandler("STDC", FPContractHandler.get());
   FPContractHandler.reset();
-
-  PP.RemovePragmaHandler("clang", OptimizeHandler.get());
-  OptimizeHandler.reset();
-
-  PP.RemovePragmaHandler("clang", LoopHintHandler.get());
-  LoopHintHandler.reset();
-}
-
-/// \brief Handle the annotation token produced for #pragma unused(...)
+
+  PP.RemovePragmaHandler("clang", OptimizeHandler.get());
+  OptimizeHandler.reset();
+
+  PP.RemovePragmaHandler("clang", LoopHintHandler.get());
+  LoopHintHandler.reset();
+}
+
+/// \brief Handle the annotation token produced for #pragma unused(...)
 ///
 /// Each annot_pragma_unused is followed by the argument token so e.g.
 /// "#pragma unused(x,y)" becomes:
@@ -596,46 +596,46 @@ unsigned Parser::HandlePragmaMSSegment(l
 unsigned Parser::HandlePragmaMSInitSeg(llvm::StringRef PragmaName,
                                        SourceLocation PragmaLocation) {
   return PP.getDiagnostics().getCustomDiagID(
-      DiagnosticsEngine::Error, "'#pragma %0' not implemented.");
-}
-
-struct PragmaLoopHintInfo {
-  Token Loop;
-  Token Value;
-  Token Option;
-};
-
-LoopHint Parser::HandlePragmaLoopHint() {
-  assert(Tok.is(tok::annot_pragma_loop_hint));
-  PragmaLoopHintInfo *Info =
-      static_cast<PragmaLoopHintInfo *>(Tok.getAnnotationValue());
-
-  LoopHint Hint;
-  Hint.LoopLoc =
-      IdentifierLoc::create(Actions.Context, Info->Loop.getLocation(),
-                            Info->Loop.getIdentifierInfo());
-  Hint.OptionLoc =
-      IdentifierLoc::create(Actions.Context, Info->Option.getLocation(),
-                            Info->Option.getIdentifierInfo());
-  Hint.ValueLoc =
-      IdentifierLoc::create(Actions.Context, Info->Value.getLocation(),
-                            Info->Value.getIdentifierInfo());
-  Hint.Range =
-      SourceRange(Info->Option.getLocation(), Info->Value.getLocation());
-
-  // FIXME: We should support template parameters for the loop hint value.
-  // See bug report #19610
-  if (Info->Value.is(tok::numeric_constant))
-    Hint.ValueExpr = Actions.ActOnNumericConstant(Info->Value).get();
-  else
-    Hint.ValueExpr = nullptr;
-
-  return Hint;
-}
-
-// #pragma GCC visibility comes in two variants:
-//   'push' '(' [visibility] ')'
-//   'pop'
+      DiagnosticsEngine::Error, "'#pragma %0' not implemented.");
+}
+
+struct PragmaLoopHintInfo {
+  Token Loop;
+  Token Value;
+  Token Option;
+};
+
+LoopHint Parser::HandlePragmaLoopHint() {
+  assert(Tok.is(tok::annot_pragma_loop_hint));
+  PragmaLoopHintInfo *Info =
+      static_cast<PragmaLoopHintInfo *>(Tok.getAnnotationValue());
+
+  LoopHint Hint;
+  Hint.LoopLoc =
+      IdentifierLoc::create(Actions.Context, Info->Loop.getLocation(),
+                            Info->Loop.getIdentifierInfo());
+  Hint.OptionLoc =
+      IdentifierLoc::create(Actions.Context, Info->Option.getLocation(),
+                            Info->Option.getIdentifierInfo());
+  Hint.ValueLoc =
+      IdentifierLoc::create(Actions.Context, Info->Value.getLocation(),
+                            Info->Value.getIdentifierInfo());
+  Hint.Range =
+      SourceRange(Info->Option.getLocation(), Info->Value.getLocation());
+
+  // FIXME: We should support template parameters for the loop hint value.
+  // See bug report #19610
+  if (Info->Value.is(tok::numeric_constant))
+    Hint.ValueExpr = Actions.ActOnNumericConstant(Info->Value).get();
+  else
+    Hint.ValueExpr = nullptr;
+
+  return Hint;
+}
+
+// #pragma GCC visibility comes in two variants:
+//   'push' '(' [visibility] ')'
+//   'pop'
 void PragmaGCCVisibilityHandler::HandlePragma(Preprocessor &PP, 
                                               PragmaIntroducerKind Introducer,
                                               Token &VisTok) {
@@ -1628,113 +1628,113 @@ void PragmaOptimizeHandler::HandlePragma
       << PP.getSpelling(Tok);
     return;
   }
-
-  Actions.ActOnPragmaOptimize(IsOn, FirstToken.getLocation());
-}
-
-/// \brief Handle the \#pragma clang loop directive.
-///  #pragma clang 'loop' loop-hints
-///
-///  loop-hints:
-///    loop-hint loop-hints[opt]
-///
-///  loop-hint:
-///    'vectorize' '(' loop-hint-keyword ')'
-///    'interleave' '(' loop-hint-keyword ')'
-///    'vectorize_width' '(' loop-hint-value ')'
-///    'interleave_count' '(' loop-hint-value ')'
-///
-///  loop-hint-keyword:
-///    'enable'
-///    'disable'
-///
-///  loop-hint-value:
-///    constant-expression
-///
-/// Specifying vectorize(enable) or vectorize_width(_value_) instructs llvm to
-/// try vectorizing the instructions of the loop it precedes. Specifying
-/// interleave(enable) or interleave_count(_value_) instructs llvm to try
-/// interleaving multiple iterations of the loop it precedes. The width of the
-/// vector instructions is specified by vectorize_width() and the number of
-/// interleaved loop iterations is specified by interleave_count(). Specifying a
-/// value of 1 effectively disables vectorization/interleaving, even if it is
-/// possible and profitable, and 0 is invalid. The loop vectorizer currently
-/// only works on inner loops.
-///
-void PragmaLoopHintHandler::HandlePragma(Preprocessor &PP,
-                                         PragmaIntroducerKind Introducer,
-                                         Token &Tok) {
-  Token Loop = Tok;
-  SmallVector<Token, 1> TokenList;
-
-  // Lex the optimization option and verify it is an identifier.
-  PP.Lex(Tok);
-  if (Tok.isNot(tok::identifier)) {
-    PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_option)
-        << /*MissingOption=*/true << "";
-    return;
-  }
-
-  while (Tok.is(tok::identifier)) {
-    Token Option = Tok;
-    IdentifierInfo *OptionInfo = Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
-
-    if (!OptionInfo->isStr("vectorize") && !OptionInfo->isStr("interleave") &&
-        !OptionInfo->isStr("vectorize_width") &&
-        !OptionInfo->isStr("interleave_count")) {
-      PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_option)
-          << /*MissingOption=*/false << OptionInfo;
-      return;
-    }
-
-    // Read '('
-    PP.Lex(Tok);
-    if (Tok.isNot(tok::l_paren)) {
-      PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_expected) << tok::l_paren;
-      return;
-    }
-
-    // FIXME: All tokens between '(' and ')' should be stored and parsed as a
-    // constant expression.
-    PP.Lex(Tok);
-    Token Value;
-    if (Tok.is(tok::identifier) || Tok.is(tok::numeric_constant))
-      Value = Tok;
-
-    // Read ')'
-    PP.Lex(Tok);
-    if (Tok.isNot(tok::r_paren)) {
-      PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_expected) << tok::r_paren;
-      return;
-    }
-
-    // Get next optimization option.
-    PP.Lex(Tok);
-
-    auto *Info = new (PP.getPreprocessorAllocator()) PragmaLoopHintInfo;
-    Info->Loop = Loop;
-    Info->Option = Option;
-    Info->Value = Value;
-
-    // Generate the vectorization hint token.
-    Token LoopHintTok;
-    LoopHintTok.startToken();
-    LoopHintTok.setKind(tok::annot_pragma_loop_hint);
-    LoopHintTok.setLocation(Loop.getLocation());
-    LoopHintTok.setAnnotationValue(static_cast<void *>(Info));
-    TokenList.push_back(LoopHintTok);
-  }
-
-  if (Tok.isNot(tok::eod)) {
-    PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::warn_pragma_extra_tokens_at_eol)
-        << "clang loop";
-    return;
-  }
-
-  Token *TokenArray = new Token[TokenList.size()];
-  std::copy(TokenList.begin(), TokenList.end(), TokenArray);
-
-  PP.EnterTokenStream(TokenArray, TokenList.size(),
-                      /*DisableMacroExpansion=*/false,
-                      /*OwnsTokens=*/true);
-}
+
+  Actions.ActOnPragmaOptimize(IsOn, FirstToken.getLocation());
+}
+
+/// \brief Handle the \#pragma clang loop directive.
+///  #pragma clang 'loop' loop-hints
+///
+///  loop-hints:
+///    loop-hint loop-hints[opt]
+///
+///  loop-hint:
+///    'vectorize' '(' loop-hint-keyword ')'
+///    'interleave' '(' loop-hint-keyword ')'
+///    'vectorize_width' '(' loop-hint-value ')'
+///    'interleave_count' '(' loop-hint-value ')'
+///
+///  loop-hint-keyword:
+///    'enable'
+///    'disable'
+///
+///  loop-hint-value:
+///    constant-expression
+///
+/// Specifying vectorize(enable) or vectorize_width(_value_) instructs llvm to
+/// try vectorizing the instructions of the loop it precedes. Specifying
+/// interleave(enable) or interleave_count(_value_) instructs llvm to try
+/// interleaving multiple iterations of the loop it precedes. The width of the
+/// vector instructions is specified by vectorize_width() and the number of
+/// interleaved loop iterations is specified by interleave_count(). Specifying a
+/// value of 1 effectively disables vectorization/interleaving, even if it is
+/// possible and profitable, and 0 is invalid. The loop vectorizer currently
+/// only works on inner loops.
+///
+void PragmaLoopHintHandler::HandlePragma(Preprocessor &PP,
+                                         PragmaIntroducerKind Introducer,
+                                         Token &Tok) {
+  Token Loop = Tok;
+  SmallVector<Token, 1> TokenList;
+
+  // Lex the optimization option and verify it is an identifier.
+  PP.Lex(Tok);
+  if (Tok.isNot(tok::identifier)) {
+    PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_option)
+        << /*MissingOption=*/true << "";
+    return;
+  }
+
+  while (Tok.is(tok::identifier)) {
+    Token Option = Tok;
+    IdentifierInfo *OptionInfo = Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
+
+    if (!OptionInfo->isStr("vectorize") && !OptionInfo->isStr("interleave") &&
+        !OptionInfo->isStr("vectorize_width") &&
+        !OptionInfo->isStr("interleave_count")) {
+      PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_option)
+          << /*MissingOption=*/false << OptionInfo;
+      return;
+    }
+
+    // Read '('
+    PP.Lex(Tok);
+    if (Tok.isNot(tok::l_paren)) {
+      PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_expected) << tok::l_paren;
+      return;
+    }
+
+    // FIXME: All tokens between '(' and ')' should be stored and parsed as a
+    // constant expression.
+    PP.Lex(Tok);
+    Token Value;
+    if (Tok.is(tok::identifier) || Tok.is(tok::numeric_constant))
+      Value = Tok;
+
+    // Read ')'
+    PP.Lex(Tok);
+    if (Tok.isNot(tok::r_paren)) {
+      PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::err_expected) << tok::r_paren;
+      return;
+    }
+
+    // Get next optimization option.
+    PP.Lex(Tok);
+
+    auto *Info = new (PP.getPreprocessorAllocator()) PragmaLoopHintInfo;
+    Info->Loop = Loop;
+    Info->Option = Option;
+    Info->Value = Value;
+
+    // Generate the vectorization hint token.
+    Token LoopHintTok;
+    LoopHintTok.startToken();
+    LoopHintTok.setKind(tok::annot_pragma_loop_hint);
+    LoopHintTok.setLocation(Loop.getLocation());
+    LoopHintTok.setAnnotationValue(static_cast<void *>(Info));
+    TokenList.push_back(LoopHintTok);
+  }
+
+  if (Tok.isNot(tok::eod)) {
+    PP.Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::warn_pragma_extra_tokens_at_eol)
+        << "clang loop";
+    return;
+  }
+
+  Token *TokenArray = new Token[TokenList.size()];
+  std::copy(TokenList.begin(), TokenList.end(), TokenArray);
+
+  PP.EnterTokenStream(TokenArray, TokenList.size(),
+                      /*DisableMacroExpansion=*/false,
+                      /*OwnsTokens=*/true);
+}

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp?rev=210369&r1=210368&r2=210369&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaStmtAttr.cpp Fri Jun  6 15:31:48 2014
@@ -13,13 +13,13 @@
 
 #include "clang/Sema/SemaInternal.h"
 #include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
-#include "clang/Basic/SourceManager.h"
-#include "clang/Sema/DelayedDiagnostic.h"
-#include "clang/Sema/Lookup.h"
-#include "clang/Sema/LoopHint.h"
-#include "clang/Sema/ScopeInfo.h"
-#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
-
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceManager.h"
+#include "clang/Sema/DelayedDiagnostic.h"
+#include "clang/Sema/Lookup.h"
+#include "clang/Sema/LoopHint.h"
+#include "clang/Sema/ScopeInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
+
 using namespace clang;
 using namespace sema;
 
@@ -40,176 +40,176 @@ static Attr *handleFallThroughAttr(Sema
     return nullptr;
   }
   return ::new (S.Context) FallThroughAttr(A.getRange(), S.Context,
-                                           A.getAttributeSpellingListIndex());
-}
-
-static Attr *handleLoopHintAttr(Sema &S, Stmt *St, const AttributeList &A,
-                                SourceRange) {
-  if (St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::DoStmtClass &&
-      St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::ForStmtClass &&
-      St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::CXXForRangeStmtClass &&
-      St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::WhileStmtClass) {
-    S.Diag(St->getLocStart(), diag::err_pragma_loop_precedes_nonloop);
-    return nullptr;
-  }
-
-  IdentifierLoc *OptionLoc = A.getArgAsIdent(0);
-  IdentifierInfo *OptionInfo = OptionLoc->Ident;
-  IdentifierLoc *ValueLoc = A.getArgAsIdent(1);
-  IdentifierInfo *ValueInfo = ValueLoc->Ident;
-  Expr *ValueExpr = A.getArgAsExpr(2);
-
-  assert(OptionInfo && "Attribute must have valid option info.");
-
-  LoopHintAttr::OptionType Option =
-      llvm::StringSwitch<LoopHintAttr::OptionType>(OptionInfo->getNameStart())
-          .Case("vectorize", LoopHintAttr::Vectorize)
-          .Case("vectorize_width", LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth)
-          .Case("interleave", LoopHintAttr::Interleave)
-          .Case("interleave_count", LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount)
-          .Default(LoopHintAttr::Vectorize);
-
-  int ValueInt;
-  if (Option == LoopHintAttr::Vectorize || Option == LoopHintAttr::Interleave) {
-    if (!ValueInfo) {
-      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_keyword)
-          << /*MissingKeyword=*/true << "";
-      return nullptr;
-    }
-
-    if (ValueInfo->isStr("disable"))
-      ValueInt = 0;
-    else if (ValueInfo->isStr("enable"))
-      ValueInt = 1;
-    else {
-      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_keyword)
-          << /*MissingKeyword=*/false << ValueInfo;
-      return nullptr;
-    }
-  } else if (Option == LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth ||
-             Option == LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount) {
-    // FIXME: We should support template parameters for the loop hint value.
-    // See bug report #19610.
-    llvm::APSInt ValueAPS;
-    if (!ValueExpr || !ValueExpr->isIntegerConstantExpr(ValueAPS, S.Context)) {
-      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_value)
-          << /*MissingValue=*/true << "";
-      return nullptr;
-    }
-
-    if ((ValueInt = ValueAPS.getSExtValue()) < 1) {
-      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_value)
-          << /*MissingValue=*/false << ValueInt;
-      return nullptr;
-    }
-  } else
-    llvm_unreachable("Unknown loop hint option");
-
-  return LoopHintAttr::CreateImplicit(S.Context, Option, ValueInt,
-                                      A.getRange());
-}
-
-static void
-CheckForIncompatibleAttributes(Sema &S, SmallVectorImpl<const Attr *> &Attrs) {
-  int PrevOptionValue[4] = {-1, -1, -1, -1};
-  int OptionId[4] = {LoopHintAttr::Vectorize, LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth,
-                     LoopHintAttr::Interleave, LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount};
-
-  for (const auto *I : Attrs) {
-    const LoopHintAttr *LH = dyn_cast<LoopHintAttr>(I);
-
-    // Skip non loop hint attributes
-    if (!LH)
-      continue;
-
-    int State, Value;
-    int Option = LH->getOption();
-    int ValueInt = LH->getValue();
-
-    switch (Option) {
-    case LoopHintAttr::Vectorize:
-    case LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth:
-      State = 0;
-      Value = 1;
-      break;
-    case LoopHintAttr::Interleave:
-    case LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount:
-      State = 2;
-      Value = 3;
-      break;
-    }
-
-    SourceLocation ValueLoc = LH->getRange().getEnd();
-
-    // Compatibility testing is split into two cases.
-    // 1. if the current loop hint sets state (enable/disable) - check against
-    // previous state and value.
-    // 2. if the current loop hint sets a value - check against previous state
-    // and value.
-
-    if (Option == State) {
-      if (PrevOptionValue[State] != -1) {
-        // Cannot specify state twice.
-        int PrevValue = PrevOptionValue[State];
-        S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
-            << /*Duplicate=*/true << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
-            << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(PrevValue)
-            << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
-            << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(Value);
-      }
-
-      if (PrevOptionValue[Value] != -1) {
-        // Compare state with previous width/count.
-        int PrevOption = OptionId[Value];
-        int PrevValueInt = PrevOptionValue[Value];
-        if ((ValueInt == 0 && PrevValueInt > 1) ||
-            (ValueInt == 1 && PrevValueInt <= 1))
-          S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
-              << /*Duplicate=*/false << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(PrevOption)
-              << PrevValueInt << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
-              << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(ValueInt);
-      }
-    } else {
-      if (PrevOptionValue[State] != -1) {
-        // Compare width/count value with previous state.
-        int PrevOption = OptionId[State];
-        int PrevValueInt = PrevOptionValue[State];
-        if ((ValueInt > 1 && PrevValueInt == 0) ||
-            (ValueInt <= 1 && PrevValueInt == 1))
-          S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
-              << /*Duplicate=*/false << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(PrevOption)
-              << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(PrevValueInt)
-              << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option) << ValueInt;
-      }
-
-      if (PrevOptionValue[Value] != -1) {
-        // Cannot specify a width/count twice.
-        int PrevValueInt = PrevOptionValue[Value];
-        S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
-            << /*Duplicate=*/true << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
-            << PrevValueInt << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option) << ValueInt;
-      }
-    }
-
-    PrevOptionValue[Option] = ValueInt;
-  }
-}
-
-static Attr *ProcessStmtAttribute(Sema &S, Stmt *St, const AttributeList &A,
-                                  SourceRange Range) {
-  switch (A.getKind()) {
+                                           A.getAttributeSpellingListIndex());
+}
+
+static Attr *handleLoopHintAttr(Sema &S, Stmt *St, const AttributeList &A,
+                                SourceRange) {
+  if (St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::DoStmtClass &&
+      St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::ForStmtClass &&
+      St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::CXXForRangeStmtClass &&
+      St->getStmtClass() != Stmt::WhileStmtClass) {
+    S.Diag(St->getLocStart(), diag::err_pragma_loop_precedes_nonloop);
+    return nullptr;
+  }
+
+  IdentifierLoc *OptionLoc = A.getArgAsIdent(0);
+  IdentifierInfo *OptionInfo = OptionLoc->Ident;
+  IdentifierLoc *ValueLoc = A.getArgAsIdent(1);
+  IdentifierInfo *ValueInfo = ValueLoc->Ident;
+  Expr *ValueExpr = A.getArgAsExpr(2);
+
+  assert(OptionInfo && "Attribute must have valid option info.");
+
+  LoopHintAttr::OptionType Option =
+      llvm::StringSwitch<LoopHintAttr::OptionType>(OptionInfo->getNameStart())
+          .Case("vectorize", LoopHintAttr::Vectorize)
+          .Case("vectorize_width", LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth)
+          .Case("interleave", LoopHintAttr::Interleave)
+          .Case("interleave_count", LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount)
+          .Default(LoopHintAttr::Vectorize);
+
+  int ValueInt;
+  if (Option == LoopHintAttr::Vectorize || Option == LoopHintAttr::Interleave) {
+    if (!ValueInfo) {
+      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_keyword)
+          << /*MissingKeyword=*/true << "";
+      return nullptr;
+    }
+
+    if (ValueInfo->isStr("disable"))
+      ValueInt = 0;
+    else if (ValueInfo->isStr("enable"))
+      ValueInt = 1;
+    else {
+      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_keyword)
+          << /*MissingKeyword=*/false << ValueInfo;
+      return nullptr;
+    }
+  } else if (Option == LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth ||
+             Option == LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount) {
+    // FIXME: We should support template parameters for the loop hint value.
+    // See bug report #19610.
+    llvm::APSInt ValueAPS;
+    if (!ValueExpr || !ValueExpr->isIntegerConstantExpr(ValueAPS, S.Context)) {
+      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_value)
+          << /*MissingValue=*/true << "";
+      return nullptr;
+    }
+
+    if ((ValueInt = ValueAPS.getSExtValue()) < 1) {
+      S.Diag(ValueLoc->Loc, diag::err_pragma_loop_invalid_value)
+          << /*MissingValue=*/false << ValueInt;
+      return nullptr;
+    }
+  } else
+    llvm_unreachable("Unknown loop hint option");
+
+  return LoopHintAttr::CreateImplicit(S.Context, Option, ValueInt,
+                                      A.getRange());
+}
+
+static void
+CheckForIncompatibleAttributes(Sema &S, SmallVectorImpl<const Attr *> &Attrs) {
+  int PrevOptionValue[4] = {-1, -1, -1, -1};
+  int OptionId[4] = {LoopHintAttr::Vectorize, LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth,
+                     LoopHintAttr::Interleave, LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount};
+
+  for (const auto *I : Attrs) {
+    const LoopHintAttr *LH = dyn_cast<LoopHintAttr>(I);
+
+    // Skip non loop hint attributes
+    if (!LH)
+      continue;
+
+    int State, Value;
+    int Option = LH->getOption();
+    int ValueInt = LH->getValue();
+
+    switch (Option) {
+    case LoopHintAttr::Vectorize:
+    case LoopHintAttr::VectorizeWidth:
+      State = 0;
+      Value = 1;
+      break;
+    case LoopHintAttr::Interleave:
+    case LoopHintAttr::InterleaveCount:
+      State = 2;
+      Value = 3;
+      break;
+    }
+
+    SourceLocation ValueLoc = LH->getRange().getEnd();
+
+    // Compatibility testing is split into two cases.
+    // 1. if the current loop hint sets state (enable/disable) - check against
+    // previous state and value.
+    // 2. if the current loop hint sets a value - check against previous state
+    // and value.
+
+    if (Option == State) {
+      if (PrevOptionValue[State] != -1) {
+        // Cannot specify state twice.
+        int PrevValue = PrevOptionValue[State];
+        S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
+            << /*Duplicate=*/true << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
+            << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(PrevValue)
+            << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
+            << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(Value);
+      }
+
+      if (PrevOptionValue[Value] != -1) {
+        // Compare state with previous width/count.
+        int PrevOption = OptionId[Value];
+        int PrevValueInt = PrevOptionValue[Value];
+        if ((ValueInt == 0 && PrevValueInt > 1) ||
+            (ValueInt == 1 && PrevValueInt <= 1))
+          S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
+              << /*Duplicate=*/false << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(PrevOption)
+              << PrevValueInt << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
+              << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(ValueInt);
+      }
+    } else {
+      if (PrevOptionValue[State] != -1) {
+        // Compare width/count value with previous state.
+        int PrevOption = OptionId[State];
+        int PrevValueInt = PrevOptionValue[State];
+        if ((ValueInt > 1 && PrevValueInt == 0) ||
+            (ValueInt <= 1 && PrevValueInt == 1))
+          S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
+              << /*Duplicate=*/false << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(PrevOption)
+              << LoopHintAttr::getValueName(PrevValueInt)
+              << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option) << ValueInt;
+      }
+
+      if (PrevOptionValue[Value] != -1) {
+        // Cannot specify a width/count twice.
+        int PrevValueInt = PrevOptionValue[Value];
+        S.Diag(ValueLoc, diag::err_pragma_loop_compatibility)
+            << /*Duplicate=*/true << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option)
+            << PrevValueInt << LoopHintAttr::getOptionName(Option) << ValueInt;
+      }
+    }
+
+    PrevOptionValue[Option] = ValueInt;
+  }
+}
+
+static Attr *ProcessStmtAttribute(Sema &S, Stmt *St, const AttributeList &A,
+                                  SourceRange Range) {
+  switch (A.getKind()) {
   case AttributeList::UnknownAttribute:
     S.Diag(A.getLoc(), A.isDeclspecAttribute() ?
            diag::warn_unhandled_ms_attribute_ignored :
            diag::warn_unknown_attribute_ignored) << A.getName();
-    return nullptr;
-  case AttributeList::AT_FallThrough:
-    return handleFallThroughAttr(S, St, A, Range);
-  case AttributeList::AT_LoopHint:
-    return handleLoopHintAttr(S, St, A, Range);
-  default:
-    // if we're here, then we parsed a known attribute, but didn't recognize
-    // it as a statement attribute => it is declaration attribute
+    return nullptr;
+  case AttributeList::AT_FallThrough:
+    return handleFallThroughAttr(S, St, A, Range);
+  case AttributeList::AT_LoopHint:
+    return handleLoopHintAttr(S, St, A, Range);
+  default:
+    // if we're here, then we parsed a known attribute, but didn't recognize
+    // it as a statement attribute => it is declaration attribute
     S.Diag(A.getRange().getBegin(), diag::err_attribute_invalid_on_stmt)
         << A.getName() << St->getLocStart();
     return nullptr;
@@ -221,13 +221,13 @@ StmtResult Sema::ProcessStmtAttributes(S
   SmallVector<const Attr*, 8> Attrs;
   for (const AttributeList* l = AttrList; l; l = l->getNext()) {
     if (Attr *a = ProcessStmtAttribute(*this, S, *l, Range))
-      Attrs.push_back(a);
-  }
-
-  CheckForIncompatibleAttributes(*this, Attrs);
-
-  if (Attrs.empty())
-    return S;
-
+      Attrs.push_back(a);
+  }
+
+  CheckForIncompatibleAttributes(*this, Attrs);
+
+  if (Attrs.empty())
+    return S;
+
   return ActOnAttributedStmt(Range.getBegin(), Attrs, S);
 }

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/class-layout.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/class-layout.cpp?rev=210369&r1=210368&r2=210369&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/class-layout.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/class-layout.cpp Fri Jun  6 15:31:48 2014
@@ -94,9 +94,9 @@ namespace Test7 {
 
 // Shouldn't crash.
 namespace Test8 {
-	struct A {};
-	struct D { int a; };
-	struct B : virtual D, A { };
-	struct C : B, A { void f() {} };
-	C c;
+  struct A {};
+  struct D { int a; };
+  struct B : virtual D, A { };
+  struct C : B, A { void f() {} };
+  C c;
 }





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list