r207833 - XCore target: fix handling of -g0 flag
David Blaikie
dblaikie at gmail.com
Fri May 2 07:45:28 PDT 2014
Is there any reason this code is xcore specific? Would've figured the basic
debug flags would mostly be covered in some generic way? But I haven't
looked. Perhaps there's good reason not to do that.
On May 2, 2014 2:43 AM, "Robert Lytton" <robert at xmos.com> wrote:
> Author: rlytton
> Date: Fri May 2 04:33:25 2014
> New Revision: 207833
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=207833&view=rev
> Log:
> XCore target: fix handling of -g0 flag
>
> Modified:
> cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp
> cfe/trunk/test/Driver/xcore-opts.c
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?rev=207833&r1=207832&r2=207833&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp Fri May 2 04:33:25 2014
> @@ -7622,8 +7622,9 @@ void XCore::Assemble::ConstructJob(Compi
> if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_v))
> CmdArgs.push_back("-v");
>
> - if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_g_Group))
> - CmdArgs.push_back("-g");
> + if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_g_Group))
> + if (!A->getOption().matches(options::OPT_g0))
> + CmdArgs.push_back("-g");
>
> if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fverbose_asm,
> options::OPT_fno_verbose_asm,
> false))
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Driver/xcore-opts.c
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Driver/xcore-opts.c?rev=207833&r1=207832&r2=207833&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Driver/xcore-opts.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Driver/xcore-opts.c Fri May 2 04:33:25 2014
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> // RUN: %clang -target xcore %s -g -Wl,L1Arg,L2Arg -Wa,A1Arg,A2Arg
> -fverbose-asm -v -### -o %t.o 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
> // RUN: %clang -target xcore -x c++ %s -g -Wl,L1Arg,L2Arg -Wa,A1Arg,A2Arg
> -fverbose-asm -v -### -o %t.o 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
> // RUN: %clang -target xcore -x c++ %s -fexceptions -### -o %t.o 2>&1 |
> FileCheck -check-prefix CHECK-EXCEP %s
> +// RUN: %clang -target xcore %s -g0 -### -o %t.o 2>&1 | FileCheck
> -check-prefix CHECK-G0 %s
>
> // CHECK: "-nostdsysteminc"
> // CHECK: "-momit-leaf-frame-pointer"
> @@ -27,3 +28,7 @@
> // CHECK-EXCEP: xcc" "-o"
> // CHECK-EXCEP: "-fexceptions"
>
> +// CHECK-G0: xcc"
> +// CHECK-G0-NOT: "-g"
> +// CHECK-G0: xcc"
> +
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140502/0a70e082/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list