[patch] Drop support for non-cfi capable assemblers

[Chris Lattner]

Me too.  Thanks Rafael,

-Chris

On Apr 29, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Apologies, I'd actually thought Chris had gotten this.
> 
> At any rate, I'm cool with this.
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> -eric
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rafael Espíndola
> <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ping
>> 
>> On 26 March 2014 20:17, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 23 March 2014 23:21, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm down with the general idea, people wanting a cutting edge compiler
>>>> with an old assembler would be an odd use case that I'm not sure we
>>>> care overly much about.
>>> 
>>> The make the proposal more concrete, is the attached clang patch OK?
>>> 
>>> It removes support from the clang side. If that is OK, we can wait a
>>> couple of weeks before removing the support from the llvm side.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rafael