[patch] Drop support for non-cfi capable assemblers

[Eric Christopher]

Apologies, I'd actually thought Chris had gotten this.

At any rate, I'm cool with this.

LGTM.

-eric

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rafael Espíndola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> ping
>
> On 26 March 2014 20:17, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 23 March 2014 23:21, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm down with the general idea, people wanting a cutting edge compiler
>>> with an old assembler would be an odd use case that I'm not sure we
>>> care overly much about.
>>
>> The make the proposal more concrete, is the attached clang patch OK?
>>
>> It removes support from the clang side. If that is OK, we can wait a
>> couple of weeks before removing the support from the llvm side.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rafael