r196482 - Update C++ status from 'SVN' to 'Clang 3.4' in preparation for release. Leave

[Chandler Carruth]

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:

> On 05/12/2013 08:43, Richard Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Think it'd make sense to reverse the order of the status page to put
>> newer standards at the top?
>>
>> Right now you have to do a lot of scrolling to get to anything
>> interesting. Search engines also seem to be focusing on C++98 for the
>> search results summary.
>>
>
>  Yes, the page is definitely getting unwieldy. Perhaps adding a table of
> contents at the top of the page would help more than reordering the
> sections? I would guess people are hitting this page for C++11 as much as
> they are for C++14.
>
>
> Well, I'd go for new features on the top based on the assumption that
> someone looking for C++11 is still going to find the C++14 status more
> informative than paging through historic standards.


Just my 2 cents but I'd keep it ordered as is.

I expect that at some point, we'll condense the C++11 stuff to the same
amount of detail we provide for C++98 now. ;] And so on. So that the
baseline is at the top, and everything else are deltas.

This isn't new though, that's how we handled C++98: per-feature check boxes
until we were done and satisfied, then a simple statement.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131205/78777a8a/attachment.html>