[patch] Drop windows specific handling of equivalent destructors

[Reid Kleckner]

LGTM  :)

IMO RAUW is better because you actually put something in the module with
the appropriate name that you can refer back to, and later it is removed
transparently.

The current approach used to have a bug where we try to emit the complete
dtor, which emits the base dtor, and then we try to emit the base dtor,
which is already emitted.  =/


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> Now that the relevant tests use -mconstructor-aliases and the missing
> features have been implemented, we can just drop this.
>
> This technique is quiet interesting and a bit more elegant than using
> rauw, but it would require a fairly invasive change to how we emit
> thunks to make it general, so it is probably better to just remove it
> for now.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131113/b4654bd4/attachment.html>