r193230 - And Again: Teach TreeTransform how to transform nested generic lambdas.

[Faisal Vali]

Just as a simple sanity check to ensure dependent types (or an auto) don't
creep into codegen and cause assertion failures (I had to struggle w one or
two of those instances).

But can remove the emission if it seems poor form or for any other good
reason?

thanks!


Faisal Vali



On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-generic-lambdas.cpp (original)
> > +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-generic-lambdas.cpp Wed Oct 23 01:44:28
> 2013
> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1y -verify -fsyntax-only -fblocks %s
> > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1y -verify -fsyntax-only -fblocks -emit-llvm
> -o - %s
>
> Why emit llvm if you are not checking the output?
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131023/97b4ad21/attachment.html>