chrono libcxx msvcrt patch slight revision

Yaron Keren yaron.keren at gmail.com
Fri Oct 4 14:26:39 PDT 2013


Compilation error are better: if there is a known problem why wait to
runtime to error? what's the gain?

Yaron



2013/10/5 Howard Hinnant <howard.hinnant at gmail.com>

> On Sep 21, 2013, at 4:08 PM, G M <gmisocpp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Slight revision to prior chrono patch: Added _LIBCPP_NORETURN.
> > (Note dependant upon #warning patch presented previously).
> > <chrono.cpp.diff>_______________________________________________
> > cfe-commits mailing list
> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
> Question for those interested in libc++ on Windows:
>
> I generally prefer my errors to come at compile time, or at least link
> time, rather than run time.  This patch delays until runtime the fact that
> the chrono clocks are not implemented.  Is that really what the Windows
> porters want?  If so, I'll commit this patch.  I just wanted to ask first,
> as it is not what I did for Apple platforms.
>
> Howard
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131005/379304d0/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list