[PATCH] Implement transformations of non-capturing nested lambdas.

[Douglas Gregor]

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Faisal Vali <faisalv at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>  What's wrong with my approach of marking the specialization as a specialization instead? It does not trigger any assertion violations and all seems to work well?

Oh! I didn't realize that solved the issue for you. Patch LGTM then!

> 
> ================
> Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp:953
> @@ +952,3 @@
> +        // 'FunctionDecl::getTemplateInstantiationPattern()' 
> +        NewCallOperatorTemplate->setMemberSpecialization();
> +      }
> ----------------
> But this seems to work and return the correct getTemplateInstantiationPattern - that allows addInstantiatedParameters to work as expected?
> 
> What's wrong with this approach?
> 
> 
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784