[PATCH] Implement transformations of non-capturing nested lambdas.
dgregor at apple.com
Wed Oct 2 22:04:30 PDT 2013
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 9:55 PM, Faisal Vali <faisalv at yahoo.com> wrote:
> What's wrong with my approach of marking the specialization as a specialization instead? It does not trigger any assertion violations and all seems to work well?
Oh! I didn't realize that solved the issue for you. Patch LGTM then!
> Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp:953
> @@ +952,3 @@
> + // 'FunctionDecl::getTemplateInstantiationPattern()'
> + NewCallOperatorTemplate->setMemberSpecialization();
> + }
> But this seems to work and return the correct getTemplateInstantiationPattern - that allows addInstantiatedParameters to work as expected?
> What's wrong with this approach?
More information about the cfe-commits