[PATCH] Implement transformations of non-capturing nested lambdas.
Faisal Vali
faisalv at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 2 21:55:31 PDT 2013
What's wrong with my approach of marking the specialization as a specialization instead? It does not trigger any assertion violations and all seems to work well?
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp:953
@@ +952,3 @@
+ // 'FunctionDecl::getTemplateInstantiationPattern()'
+ NewCallOperatorTemplate->setMemberSpecialization();
+ }
----------------
But this seems to work and return the correct getTemplateInstantiationPattern - that allows addInstantiatedParameters to work as expected?
What's wrong with this approach?
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list