r191559 - docs: Remove note about Identifiers being used for C++ operators

[Justin Bogner]

Author: bogner
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:10:51 2013
New Revision: 191559

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=191559&view=rev
Log:
docs: Remove note about Identifiers being used for C++ operators

C++ operators are represented by CXXOperatorName now, which is already
documented.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/docs/InternalsManual.rst

Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/InternalsManual.rst
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/docs/InternalsManual.rst?rev=191559&r1=191558&r2=191559&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/docs/InternalsManual.rst (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/docs/InternalsManual.rst Fri Sep 27 16:10:51 2013
@@ -957,10 +957,6 @@ names are inside the ``DeclarationName``
 
   The name is a simple identifier.  Use ``N.getAsIdentifierInfo()`` to retrieve
   the corresponding ``IdentifierInfo*`` pointing to the actual identifier.
-  Note that C++ overloaded operators (e.g., "``operator+``") are represented as
-  special kinds of identifiers.  Use ``IdentifierInfo``'s
-  ``getOverloadedOperatorID`` function to determine whether an identifier is an
-  overloaded operator name.
 
 ``ObjCZeroArgSelector``, ``ObjCOneArgSelector``, ``ObjCMultiArgSelector``