r190413 - Allow _clang-format as alternative to .clang-format config filename

[Daniel Jasper]

I really don't. If anything, I'd probably be leaning towards Hans's side
(with .clang-format being nice and consistent with clang-format and the ./_
just being a necessary evil). I don't know how many .clang-format files
might be out there, though ;-).


On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at hanshq.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Allow _clang-format as alternative to .clang-format config filename
> >>
> >> Dotfiles are impractical on Windows. This makes clang-format search
> >> for the style configuration file as '_clang-format' in addition to
> >> the usual '.clang-format'. This is similar to how VIM searches for
> >> '_vimrc' on Windows.
> >
> >
> > Ok, the '-' here is getting damn confusing. Should this be _clang_format?
> > .clang_format for consistency there? Or do folks really like the format
> > here?
>
> It is already consistent, though. _clang-format is consistent with
> .clang-format which is consistent with the name of the tool (which is
> consistent with the name of all the other tools).
>
> Maybe Daniel has an opinion here.
>
>  - Hans
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20130911/502c8981/attachment.html>