r186817 - Implement the part of C89 6.5.7 p3 requiring a constant initializer list

[Enea Zaffanella]

On 07/22/2013 02:28 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi wrote:
> It brings bunch of warnings in c-index-test.c with c89 mode.
> Shall we tweak c-index-test.c as c89-compliant, or should I suppress
> warnings with -Wno-c99-extensions in my builders?

As for me, no strong opinions in this respect ...
I guess the question to be answered is whether or not c-index-test.c was 
originally meant to be c89 compliant.

Enea.