[cfe-commits] r169041 - /cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
Aaron Ballman
aaron at aaronballman.com
Fri Nov 30 14:24:53 PST 2012
In theory, yes we should be able to drop the conditional operator
since bool is integer promoted to 0 or 1. But MSVC warns about the
unsafe mixture, hence the explicit conditional operator. Ironically
enough, MSVC doesn't warn about the order of operations bug. ;-)
~Aaron
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com> wrote:
>> Author: aaronballman
>> Date: Fri Nov 30 15:44:01 2012
>> New Revision: 169041
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=169041&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fixing a precedence issue with my previous commit.
>>
>> Modified:
>> cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
>>
>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp?rev=169041&r1=169040&r2=169041&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp (original)
>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp Fri Nov 30 15:44:01 2012
>> @@ -1950,7 +1950,7 @@
>> if (T->isIntegerType()) {
>> TypeKind = 0;
>> TypeInfo = (llvm::Log2_32(getContext().getTypeSize(T)) << 1) |
>> - T->isSignedIntegerType() ? 1 : 0;
>> + (T->isSignedIntegerType() ? 1 : 0);
>
> Should you just drop the conditional operator entirely?
> (should we have another class of -Wparentheses warning to catch this?)
>
>> } else if (T->isFloatingType()) {
>> TypeKind = 1;
>> TypeInfo = getContext().getTypeSize(T);
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list