[cfe-commits] Microsoft extension (enum 'enum' used in qualified name)

[Richard Smith]

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Sebastian Redl
> <sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote:
> > The real question is what how much code depends on this. I'm not sure,
> but I think we generally try not to support every oddity the MS compiler
> allows, only those that are necessary to parse system headers (including
> MS-supplied libraries like MFC and ATL) or else are very common. If they
> just occasionally appear in client code, it would be better to fix that
> code.
>
> I didn't really think about this :) but you're right, we probably
> don't need this. Francois?
>

Is there a reason that the relevant code can't just be built in C++11 mode
anyway? IIRC Microsoft's compiler doesn't explicitly distinguish between
C++98 and C++11 modes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120419/9d1205bc/attachment.html>