[cfe-commits] r146988 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p3.cpp

Nico Weber nicolasweber at gmx.de
Tue Dec 20 12:32:49 PST 2011


Author: nico
Date: Tue Dec 20 14:32:49 2011
New Revision: 146988

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=146988&view=rev
Log:
Fix a crash on invalid, http://llvm.org/pr11599


Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p3.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp?rev=146988&r1=146987&r2=146988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp Tue Dec 20 14:32:49 2011
@@ -1709,6 +1709,13 @@
         << Context.getTypeDeclType(Instantiation);
       Diag(Pattern->getLocation(), diag::note_template_decl_here);
     }
+
+    // In general, Instantiation isn't marked invalid to get more than one
+    // error for multiple undefined instantiations. But the code that does
+    // explicit declaration -> explicit definition conversion can't handle
+    // invalid declarations, so mark as invalid in that case.
+    if (TSK == TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration)
+       Instantiation->setInvalidDecl();
     return true;
   }
   Pattern = PatternDef;
@@ -1719,7 +1726,7 @@
     MSInfo->setTemplateSpecializationKind(TSK);
     MSInfo->setPointOfInstantiation(PointOfInstantiation);
   } else if (ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl *Spec 
-               = dyn_cast<ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>(Instantiation)) {
+        = dyn_cast<ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl>(Instantiation)) {
     Spec->setTemplateSpecializationKind(TSK);
     Spec->setPointOfInstantiation(PointOfInstantiation);
   }
@@ -1888,7 +1895,8 @@
       
       // If this is an explicit instantiation definition, mark the
       // vtable as used.
-      if (TSK == TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition)
+      if (TSK == TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition &&
+          !ClassTemplateSpec->isInvalidDecl())
         MarkVTableUsed(PointOfInstantiation, ClassTemplateSpec, true);
 
       return false;

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p3.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p3.cpp?rev=146988&r1=146987&r2=146988&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p3.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/temp/temp.spec/temp.explicit/p3.cpp Tue Dec 20 14:32:49 2011
@@ -72,3 +72,10 @@
   template <typename T> int S<T>::i;
   template <typename T> void S<T>::S2::h() {}
 }
+
+namespace PR11599 {
+  template <typename STRING_TYPE> class BasicStringPiece;  // expected-note {{template is declared here}}
+
+  extern template class BasicStringPiece<int>;  // expected-error{{explicit instantiation of undefined template 'PR11599::BasicStringPiece<int>}}
+  template class BasicStringPiece<int>;
+}





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list