[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] 56e241: [analyzer] Unbreak [[clang::suppress]] on checkers...
Artem Dergachev via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 31 13:55:44 PST 2024
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: 56e241a07ff7f839d39775dbf05de5153a8e7d9f
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/56e241a07ff7f839d39775dbf05de5153a8e7d9f
Author: Artem Dergachev <adergachev at apple.com>
Date: 2024-01-31 (Wed, 31 Jan 2024)
Changed paths:
M clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugSuppression.h
M clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter.cpp
M clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugSuppression.cpp
M clang/test/Analysis/Checkers/WebKit/call-args.cpp
M clang/test/Analysis/copypaste/suspicious-clones.cpp
Log Message:
-----------
[analyzer] Unbreak [[clang::suppress]] on checkers without decl-with-issue. (#79398)
There are currently a few checkers that don't fill in the bug report's
"decl-with-issue" field (typically a function in which the bug is
found).
The new attribute `[[clang::suppress]]` uses decl-with-issue to reduce
the size of the suppression source range map so that it didn't need to
do that for the entire translation unit.
I'm already seeing a few problems with this approach so I'll probably
redesign it in some point as it looks like a premature optimization. Not
only checkers shouldn't be required to pass decl-with-issue (consider
clang-tidy checkers that never had such notion), but also it's not
necessarily uniquely determined (consider leak suppressions at
allocation site).
For now I'm adding a simple stop-gap solution that falls back to
building the suppression map for the entire TU whenever decl-with-issue
isn't specified. Which won't happen in the default setup because luckily
all default checkers do provide decl-with-issue.
---------
Co-authored-by: Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs at gmail.com>
More information about the All-commits
mailing list